1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf03009159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-caesarean section analgesia: a comparison of epidural butorphanol and morphine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding was similar with the studies done by Abboud et al 10 and Palacios et al 15 . All the patients maintained a respiratory rate greater than 12 throughout the study period in the similar study done by Hunt et al 20 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The finding was similar with the studies done by Abboud et al 10 and Palacios et al 15 . All the patients maintained a respiratory rate greater than 12 throughout the study period in the similar study done by Hunt et al 20 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…interval and thereafter for every interval, VAS score in group T was always higher than group B throughout till 24 hrs. and the p value of 0.0001 at every interval was statistically highly significant Palacios et al [13] found decreased VAS with epidural Butorphanol, their results are similar to ours study whereas Rawal et al [1] found lower VAS scores with epidural Tramadol 100 mg when compared to our study The probable reason may be that they gave bolus Tramadol by lumbar epidural catheter and infusion of Tramadol by thoracic epidural catheter giving results different than our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Palacious et al and Ackerman et al reported incidence of pruritus to be 1.4% and 6.7% respectively but none of the patients in our study developed this complication. 7,8 Bharati et al and Parikh et al also did not demonstrate pruritus in any of their patients. 9,10 Respiratory depression was not seen in any patient in the presence cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%