2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-buckling analysis of cracked multilayered composite plates by pb-2 Rayleigh–Ritz method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the lead authors of the present work presented a Rayleigh-Ritz approach for large deflection analysis of composite panels and thin-walled structures based on FSDT [43][44][45], demonstrating its ability in modelling postbuckling behaviour. In the present study, this approach is extended to VAT stiffened plates and thin-walled structures undergoing thermo-mechanical loadings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, the lead authors of the present work presented a Rayleigh-Ritz approach for large deflection analysis of composite panels and thin-walled structures based on FSDT [43][44][45], demonstrating its ability in modelling postbuckling behaviour. In the present study, this approach is extended to VAT stiffened plates and thin-walled structures undergoing thermo-mechanical loadings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…For the translational springs the representative stiffness coefficient is chosen as the maximum Young's modulus of the laminate, whereas for the rotational springs it is chosen as the maximum value of the laminate'sYoung's modulus times the square of the plate thickness. Sensitivity analyses led to a value of S = 5 being chosen so that no appreciable variations in the results was observed for S in the range from 3 to 7[43,53].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Legendre polynomials are chosen because they capture localised behaviour well due to the non-periodic nature of the successive polynomials with respect to trigonometric functions [12][13][14]. Moreover, with Legendre polynomials the choice between simply-supported, clamped or free boundary conditions is done by simply including or not the first terms in the series [12,15,16], in contrast with penalization-based approaches for linear [17][18][19] and non-linear semi-analytical approaches [20][21][22][23]. It has been mentioned that at the vertical edges, the Φ 0 functions only describe the 0 behaviour, i.e.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once an ESL or LW representation of the multi-physics behavior of the structural element is assumed, the reduced equations, expressed in terms of the unknown in-plane functions, must be numerically solved. A popular strategy for the numerical treatment of the problem is based on the employment of a suitable multi-physics, or generalized, variational statement, providing the weak formulation of the problem, followed by the application of a suitable solution technique, e.g., the finite element method [13], the Rayleigh-Ritz method [16][17][18] or other similar approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%