2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10153418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post Approval Experience with Caplacizumab for Acquired Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura at a Single Institution

Abstract: Caplacizumab prevents platelet adhesion and has been approved for acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP). This study was retrospective, including all patients diagnosed with aTTP and treated with caplacizumab since commercial availability in 2019 until 28 February 2021 at a single academic hospital with no exclusion criteria. Results used definitions for outcomes in aTTP from the International Working Group Consensus. Ten patients with aTTP received caplacizumab. The median age was 52 years. Six (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous small, US-based real-world study of caplacizumab for aTTP ascribed delays in administration of the drug to prior authorization requirements and delays in laboratory testing for ADAMTS13 activity. 24 Another factor guiding selection of delayed caplacizumab could be internal protocols or decisions to treat with caplacizumab at time of clinical worsening. While it has been suggested that caplacizumab use could be reserved for specific patients, no reliable strategy exists to stratify patients and to predict poor outcomes such as refractoriness, exacerbations, or select patients who may be more severe at baseline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous small, US-based real-world study of caplacizumab for aTTP ascribed delays in administration of the drug to prior authorization requirements and delays in laboratory testing for ADAMTS13 activity. 24 Another factor guiding selection of delayed caplacizumab could be internal protocols or decisions to treat with caplacizumab at time of clinical worsening. While it has been suggested that caplacizumab use could be reserved for specific patients, no reliable strategy exists to stratify patients and to predict poor outcomes such as refractoriness, exacerbations, or select patients who may be more severe at baseline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%