2004
DOI: 10.1134/1.1774397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible variability of the magnetic field of T Tau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
30
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Observations of the CTTSs type young stars show that possibly the field may vary on the scales of months or even weeks (Smirnov et al 2004;Donati et al 2008). What the time scales of magnetic field variations in neutron stars and white dwarfs are is less clear.…”
Section: Phase Shift Due To Field Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Observations of the CTTSs type young stars show that possibly the field may vary on the scales of months or even weeks (Smirnov et al 2004;Donati et al 2008). What the time scales of magnetic field variations in neutron stars and white dwarfs are is less clear.…”
Section: Phase Shift Due To Field Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic field of young, low-mass stars may vary rapidly due to the dynamo mechanism. Spectropolarimetric observations of young CTTS stars, show that in some stars, the magnetic field can vary as fast as one week ; see also Smirnov et al 2004). This mechanism is evidently important in young stars, where the magnetic field can vary rapidly; the magnetic field of compact stars varies only slowly (e.g., Ruderman 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent measurements of the width of radiofrequency spectral lines (Bell et al 2000), together with discrepancies between experimental data (Smirnov et al 1984;Smirnov 1985;Wilson & Jäger 1987;Sorochenko 1989;Bell et al 2000) and conventional models (Baranger 1958a-c;Griem et al 1959;Griem 1967Griem , 1974 have stimulated the interest in this type of transitions. In this framework a controversy (see Griem 2005 and works cited therein) in explaining these disagreements without changing the usual frame of Stark broadening theories occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these stars are characterized by He i emission lines which have strong narrow components (NCs) to their line profiles (see Edwards et al 1994or Alencar & Basri 2000 for a discussion of NC and broad component, BC, emission in CTTSs). Smirnov et al (2004) reported detections of circular polarization in the He i 5876Å emission line of T Tau on all 3 nights they observed the star, though with significant variability from one night to the next (field measurements range from +350 G to +1100 G with no uncertainty estimates). T Tau's He i line is dominated by BC emission.…”
Section: Magnetic Fields In Accretion Shocks On Cttssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, circular polarization in the BC of the He i 5876Å emission is predicted to be less than in the NC. Therefore, the result of Smirnov et al (2004) detections. Such observations can strongly constrain the formation region of the BC emission.…”
Section: Magnetic Fields In Accretion Shocks On Cttssmentioning
confidence: 99%