Possible Steps of the Carboxylation of Ribulose-1,5-biphosphate from Intermediates: 2,3-Enediol versus 1,2-Enol

Abstract

Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) undergoes enolization to initiate fixation of atmospheric carbon dioxide in the plant carbon cycle. The known model assumes the binding of RuBP to the Rubisco active site with the subsequent formation of 2,3-enediol (2,3,4-trihydroxypent-2-ene-1,5-diyl diphosphate). In the present study, it is assumed that 1,2-enol (2,3,4-trihydroxypent-1-ene-1,5-diyl diphosphate) can be formed in the enolization step to initiate the carboxylation reaction. We have used Kohn–Sham density functional theory on WB97X-D3/Def2-TZVP levels to compare the reaction barriers in the two ways. We considered the pathways of carboxylation of 1/2-ene (mono/di)ol via the C1 and C2 carbons without taking into account the binding of RuBP to the magnesium ion. Calculations of Gibbs free energies confirm the equal probability of the formation of 2,3-enediol and 1,2-enol. Quantum–chemical modeling of enolization and carboxylation reactions supports the important role of the bridging water molecule and diphosphate groups, which provide proton transfer and lower reaction barriers. The results show that carbon dioxide fixation can occur without a magnesium ion, and binding with C1 can have a lower barrier (~12 kcal/mol) than with C2 (~23 kcal/mol).

Photosynthetic Reactions: From Molecules to Function, and from Simple Models to Complex Systems

“…This is because CO 2 fixation includes several transient steps which are hard to catch in experiments. They can, however, be assessed in silico, as shown by Fedunov & Sokolov [ 1 ]. Based on density theory and quantum chemical modelling, they confirmed equal probability of the formation of 2,3-enediol and 1,2-enol due to ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate enolisation.…”