1988
DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(88)90225-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible prognostic significance of human papillomavirus type in cervical cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
37
2
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
37
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, the lesions in patients with ACIS and coexisting CIN may show a faster progression, leading to detection at a younger age. This has been described previously for HPV 18-related lesions (Barnes et al, 1988), but we did not find a difference in HPV 18 prevalence between patients with ACIS alone or ACIS and coexisting CIN. Secondly, the involvement of the squamous epithelium may be the reason for the detection of ACIS with coexisting CIN at a younger age, since ecto-cervical lesions are more easily detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 36%
“…Firstly, the lesions in patients with ACIS and coexisting CIN may show a faster progression, leading to detection at a younger age. This has been described previously for HPV 18-related lesions (Barnes et al, 1988), but we did not find a difference in HPV 18 prevalence between patients with ACIS alone or ACIS and coexisting CIN. Secondly, the involvement of the squamous epithelium may be the reason for the detection of ACIS with coexisting CIN at a younger age, since ecto-cervical lesions are more easily detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 36%
“…Initial studies showed that the efficiency of degradation mediated by oncogenic E6 proteins was related, in part, to the strength of interaction between their C-terminal residues and the PDZ domains of their targets; thus HPV-18 E6, which has a perfect consensus PDZ-binding domain, binds and induces degradation of Dlg more efficiently than does HPV-16 E6, which has a degenerate PDZ-binding domain (Gardiol et al, 1999;Pim et al, 2000;Thomas et al, 2001). This was an important finding since there is evidence to suggest that HPV-18 produces more aggressive tumours than does HPV-16 (Barnes et al, 1988;Kurman et al, 1988;Burnett et al, 1992;Zhang et al, 1995) even though HPV-16 E6 induces the degradation of the p53 tumour suppressor more efficiently than does HPV-18 E6 (Scheffner et al, 1990). Several recent studies have also shown that the high-risk E6 proteins can target several other PDZ domain-containing proteins for proteasome-mediated degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Certainly, there is an extensive literature which indicates that HPV-18 is generally more active than HPV-16 in a variety of transformation assays (Barbosa and Schlegel, 1989;Villa and Schlegel, 1991). In addition, there are also several reports which indicate that HPV-18-containing cervical tumours have a more aggressive phenotype and are also more prone to recurrence than HPV-16-containing tumours (Barnes et al, 1988;Kurman et al, 1988;Burnett et al, 1992;Zhang et al, 1995). Since the only biochemical activity of HPV-18 which correlates with this trend, so far, is the increased activity of E6 with respect to DLG, it is tempting to speculate that it is this association which is critical for the malignant progression of HPV induced tumours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%