1965
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.139.b1650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PossibleC,TNoninvariance in the Electromagnetic Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

1966
1966
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 We have measured the asymmetry in the elastic scattering of electrons from a polarized proton target. An interference between the imaginary part of the two-photon-exchange amplitude and the one-photon-exchange amplitude could produce a polarization effect.…”
Section: Cfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 We have measured the asymmetry in the elastic scattering of electrons from a polarized proton target. An interference between the imaginary part of the two-photon-exchange amplitude and the one-photon-exchange amplitude could produce a polarization effect.…”
Section: Cfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesis about CP-violation in the electromagnetic processes in these systems was proposed a) b) for a long time (see, e.g. [12,13,14]). Our paper is close on spirit to paper [14], in which the possible CP-violation in the elastic ep-scattering is related with the availability of the so called anapole proton form factor in the matrix element of the electromagnetic proton current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of considerable importance to the present work is the possibility of a small C and T violation in the strong interaction and the suggestion by Bernstein, Feinberg, and Lee (1965) that the electromagnetic interaction may str-ongly violate both C and T invaria.nce. If :tC I is strongly violated, they estimate that the reciprocity relation for reactions between strongly interacting particles may be violated by as much as l percent.…”
Section: Disclaimermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the violation is due to the electromagnetic interaction as suggested by Bernstein, Feinberg and Lee (1965), then there was a chance that the violation might have been detected. The present experiment, however, does not rule out the possibility of an electromagnetic interac.tion violation of time reversal invarianc~.…”
Section: Chapi'er Rj'mentioning
confidence: 99%