2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible link of pioglitazone with bladder cancer in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors reported a hazard ratio (95% CI) of 1. 75 [57]. A significantly higher risk was observed in 425 patients who had been taking pioglitazone for < 24 months, with an estimated hazard ratio (95% CI) of 2.73 (1.11-6.72).…”
Section: Japan: Fujimoto and Colleagues (Single Hospital-based Retrosmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors reported a hazard ratio (95% CI) of 1. 75 [57]. A significantly higher risk was observed in 425 patients who had been taking pioglitazone for < 24 months, with an estimated hazard ratio (95% CI) of 2.73 (1.11-6.72).…”
Section: Japan: Fujimoto and Colleagues (Single Hospital-based Retrosmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In a retrospective cohort analysis of 21,335 patients with type 2 diabetes recruited from a single Japanese hospital during a 12-year period from 2000 to 2011, Fujimoto and colleagues identified a total of 170 cases of bladder cancer in the patients with diabetes (0.8%) [57]. Among them, nine cases of bladder cancer were seen in 663 patients (1.36%) who had been taking pioglitazone.…”
Section: Japan: Fujimoto and Colleagues (Single Hospital-based Retrosmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The risk of bladder cancer in case with taking pioglitazone is still controversial 38,39) . One retrospective study assessing the association between the risk of bladder cancer and use of pioglitazone in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes showed a 1.36% (9 of 663) risk of bladder cancer and a non-significant overall increase in the risk of bladder cancer (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.89 -3.45) 40) . Although the risk of bladder cancer and the use of pioglitazone in our study showed a similar trend to the previous report, a further analysis of this issue will be needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these cautions, several studies and meta-analyses of published data have reported contradictory results [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. This may result from issues associated with observational study design, including limited sample size and a lack of attention to potential biases such as cancer ascertainment bias, immortal time bias, and the effects of diabetes duration and glycaemic control [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%