2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible isotopic fractionation of argon in source obsidians and archeological artifacts from Kulkuletti, Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst obsidian has been successfully used to produce geologically meaningful 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages (Flude et al, 2010;Morgan et al, 2009;Vogel et al, 2006), it is known to be problematic for reasons that are only just starting to become clear, and it is at least qualitatively possible that these poorly-understood processes can result in over-estimation of 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age spectra and isochron ages. Brown et al (2009) and Morgan et al (2009) suggested that the Ar-isotope composition of obsidians in Ethiopia had been affected by kinetic isotope fractionation of atmospheric gas either prior to or during absorption, while Flude et al (in prep) concluded that kinetic isotope fractionation during magmatic degassing produced heterogeneously distributed excess 40 Ar due to preferential loss of 36 Ar during degassing. As already discussed, when distributed heterogeneously, excess 40 Ar may be difficult to detect via age spectra and isotope correlation diagrams (Kuiper, 2002;Sherlock and Arnaud, 1999), and this may be exacerbated when step-heating aliquots of crushed obsidian which may mix small-scale isotope reservoirs and destroy any naturally occurring isotope profiles that might be detected by stepped-heating of a single fragment (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst obsidian has been successfully used to produce geologically meaningful 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages (Flude et al, 2010;Morgan et al, 2009;Vogel et al, 2006), it is known to be problematic for reasons that are only just starting to become clear, and it is at least qualitatively possible that these poorly-understood processes can result in over-estimation of 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age spectra and isochron ages. Brown et al (2009) and Morgan et al (2009) suggested that the Ar-isotope composition of obsidians in Ethiopia had been affected by kinetic isotope fractionation of atmospheric gas either prior to or during absorption, while Flude et al (in prep) concluded that kinetic isotope fractionation during magmatic degassing produced heterogeneously distributed excess 40 Ar due to preferential loss of 36 Ar during degassing. As already discussed, when distributed heterogeneously, excess 40 Ar may be difficult to detect via age spectra and isotope correlation diagrams (Kuiper, 2002;Sherlock and Arnaud, 1999), and this may be exacerbated when step-heating aliquots of crushed obsidian which may mix small-scale isotope reservoirs and destroy any naturally occurring isotope profiles that might be detected by stepped-heating of a single fragment (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, data for this paper are limited to the sources that are well documented within the Kenyan side of the Lake Turkana Basin. Data from southern Ethiopia, a likely source area for obsidian found in the Turkana Basin, are under study (Brown et al . 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite extensive archaeological research on the Holocene in the Lake Turkana Basin, few sources of obsidian have been characterized and published (but see Merrick and Brown 1984; Merrick et al . 1994; Brown et al . 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we summarize the elemental, isotopic, and geochronological exploratory research into successful discrimination of these important Southwestern sources of archaeological obsidian in order to provide a database and strategy to deal with this problem, one that is present in other volcanic provinces worldwide (e.g., Argote‐Espino, Solé, López‐Garcia, & Stepone, ; Brown, Reid, & Negash, ; Chataigner & Gratuze, ; Glascock, ; Morgan, Renne, Taylor, & WoldeGabriel, ; Poidevin, ; Poupeau et al., ; Sahle, Morgan, Braun, Atnafu, & Hutchings, ; Shackley & Sahle, ; Vogel, Nomade, Negash, & Renne, ; Weisler & Woodhead, ). In order to provide clarity beyond XRF, we have acquired Sr, Pb, and Nd isotopic data along with 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages from sample splits for these sources (see Supplementary Document 1 for laboratory and instrumental methods for XRF, the isotopic analysis, and 40 Ar/ 39 Ar dating).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%