2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible Influence of the Route of Treatment Administration on Treatment Adherence in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with another Spanish study that reported higher scores in the adherent group for each of the four dimensions of the MSQOL-54 questionnaire for injectable treatments and oral treatments. 29 Our results are also in line with other studies 6,30 which indicate that cognitive impairment is significantly associated with non-adherence. One of the possible consequences of cognitive impairment for adherence is the increase in forgetfulness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This finding is consistent with another Spanish study that reported higher scores in the adherent group for each of the four dimensions of the MSQOL-54 questionnaire for injectable treatments and oral treatments. 29 Our results are also in line with other studies 6,30 which indicate that cognitive impairment is significantly associated with non-adherence. One of the possible consequences of cognitive impairment for adherence is the increase in forgetfulness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A few studies have compared adherence between oral DMDs and injectable DMDs. A recent study by Martinez et al reported that a change in the route of administration from injectable to oral was associated with increased adherence ( 49 ). Two retrospective analyses of short-term claims data in the US observed higher adherence to the treatment in patients initiating an oral DMD (fingolimod) compared to those initiating injectable DMDs ( 50 , 51 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there are still drawbacks on the development of antibodies as drugs, including not only their high cost of manufacture due to their complexity or the low drug survival in long-term treatments (only shown for secukinumab, but not for ixekizumab or brodalumab) but also their lack of oral bioavailability, the preferred administration route for patients, who are generally reluctant to use injectables [25,26]. Therefore, oral administration may improve the adherence and patient satisfaction with their chronic treatments [40]. Dosing regimen is another point to consider, since biologics do not need to be taken daily in psoriasis management, while optimal administration of small molecules would be defined by ADME, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and half-life time data to improve the effectiveness of treatment by maximizing drug efficacy and minimize toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%