1971
DOI: 10.1109/tns.1971.4326292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible Emittance Increase through Filamentation Due to Space Charge in Continuous Beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
91
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown by Lapostolle et al [18] and Sacherer et al [16] that for ellipsoidal bunches, where the RMS emittance is either constant or specified in advance, evolution of the RMS beam projections are nearly independent of the density profile. This means that, for the calculation of the RMS dynamics, the actual distribution can be replaced by an equivalent uniform beam, which has the same RMS values.…”
Section: A Coupled Envelope Equations In Ellipsoidal Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown by Lapostolle et al [18] and Sacherer et al [16] that for ellipsoidal bunches, where the RMS emittance is either constant or specified in advance, evolution of the RMS beam projections are nearly independent of the density profile. This means that, for the calculation of the RMS dynamics, the actual distribution can be replaced by an equivalent uniform beam, which has the same RMS values.…”
Section: A Coupled Envelope Equations In Ellipsoidal Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, it was believed that only one matched solution is present for a given set of beam and focusing parameters and that this solution becomes unstable as the focusing field intensity is raised above a certain threshold. 2,[7][8][9] The threshold corresponds to a vacuumphase advance of 90°. By vacuum-phase advance we mean the angle that a particle would rotate per focusing period in the presence of the external field but in the abscence of space-charge, and is used here as a measure of the focusing magnetic field strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the fhst order moments of eq (6) yield the following & = XL &: = -k;,,z:, t k& < zm > ~ < 9 > k;Yc= c d _" &y: = -k&y,-< e > (8) Note that if h,, = 0, eq (7) forms a closed sets of 8 equations, and eq (8) forms two sets of two closed equations If h,, # 0, eqs (7) and (8 of an infinite hierarchy of moment equations ) form the beginning For the case of alternating gradient focusing, and when the bends occupy only a fraction of the lattice, the focusmg constants J&, kj&, and the bend radius of curvature pO are dependent on s This s-dependence of the external forces implies that there will not be a constant energy-like quantity However, as in ref [l], if lipO~,~pOy, and p. are constants representing average quantities, we may define a transverse energy H:…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of transverse energy conservation xas used in ref [l] to study emrttance growth m bends This built upon earher studies which have calculated changes in emittance also using a transverse energy constraint For example, ennttance growth associated with non-uniform spacecharge distributions was examined in refs [8]- [lo] Emittance growth due to mitial beam displacements and mismatches with and without space-charge and momentum spread has been studied in, refs [ll-13,171, and references therein…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%