2020
DOI: 10.6027/temanord2020-535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible elements of a new global agreement to prevent plastic pollution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These gaps underscore the need for a legally binding global governance arrangement that would effectively and measurably limit and control plastic pollution (1,2,12). The governance failure manifests in various ways, entrenching the entire life cycle of plastics.…”
Section: Recyclabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These gaps underscore the need for a legally binding global governance arrangement that would effectively and measurably limit and control plastic pollution (1,2,12). The governance failure manifests in various ways, entrenching the entire life cycle of plastics.…”
Section: Recyclabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reach the goal, the agreement must define global criteria for the circularity of plastic products placed on global and domestic markets (see the box ). Such harmonized cri-teria will assist countries in adopting necessary regulatory, voluntary, and market-based measures (12). Extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes should be one of the mechanisms shifting the financial and physical burden of waste management to plastics producers and incentivizing design for circularity from the onset.…”
Section: Goal 2: Facilitate Safe Circularity Of Plasticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A new global agreement must consider the broader challenges that underpin the processes leading to leakage of plastics into the environment. 5 As discussed above, terms such as “marine”, “litter”, “waste”, and “debris” may contribute to limiting the scope of the agreement, failing to address plastic’s entire life cycle and broad environmental impact. Along the same line of argumentation, microplastics should be a subordinate topic to plastic pollution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%