Abstract. The Tibetan Plateau (TP) region, often referred to as the Third
Pole, is the world's highest plateau and exerts a considerable influence on
regional and global climate. The state of the snowpack over the TP is a
major research focus due to its great impact on the headwaters of a dozen
major Asian rivers. While many studies have attempted to validate
atmospheric reanalyses over the TP area in terms of temperature or
precipitation, there have been – remarkably – no studies aimed at
systematically comparing the snow depth or snow cover in global reanalyses
with satellite and in situ data. Yet, snow in reanalyses provides critical
surface information for forecast systems from the medium to sub-seasonal
timescales. Here, snow depth and snow cover from four recent global reanalysis products, namely the European Centre for
Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ERA5 and ERA-Interim reanalyses, the
Japanese 55-year Reanalysis (JRA-55) and the NASA Modern-Era Retrospective analysis
for Research and Applications (MERRA-2), are
inter-compared over the TP region. The reanalyses are evaluated
against a set of 33 in situ station observations, as well as against the
Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) snow cover and
a satellite microwave snow depth dataset. The high temporal correlation
coefficient (0.78) between the IMS snow cover and the in situ observations
provides confidence in the station data despite the relative paucity of
in situ measurement sites and the harsh operating conditions. While several reanalyses show a systematic overestimation of the snow
depth or snow cover, the reanalyses that assimilate local in situ
observations or IMS snow cover are better capable of representing the
shallow, transient snowpack over the TP region. The latter point is clearly
demonstrated by examining the family of reanalyses from the ECMWF, of which
only the older ERA-Interim assimilated IMS snow cover at high altitudes,
while ERA5 did not consider IMS snow cover for high altitudes. We further
tested the sensitivity of the ERA5-Land model in offline experiments,
assessing the impact of blown snow sublimation, snow cover to snow depth
conversion and, more importantly, excessive snowfall. These results suggest
that excessive snowfall might be the primary factor for the large
overestimation of snow depth and cover in ERA5 reanalysis. Pending a
solution for this common model precipitation bias over the Himalayas and the TP,
future snow reanalyses that optimally combine the use of satellite snow
cover and in situ snow depth observations in the assimilation and analysis
cycles have the potential to improve medium-range to sub-seasonal forecasts
for water resources applications.