1977
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0981(77)90080-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible consequences of containing microplankton for physiological rate measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
75
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On long time scales, changes in uptake rate due to die1 periodicity were evident in our results. Bottle confinement effects have been shown to lead to serious underestimates of rate processes (Venrick et al 1977) but the constant rates of chl a and POC & PON synthesis indicate no such artifacts in our experiments. Olson & Chisholm (1983) have shown that cell division patterns of nitrogenlimited phytoplankton cultures may be entrained by NH: pulses.…”
Section: Simultaneous Uptake Of Nitrogen Compoundscontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…On long time scales, changes in uptake rate due to die1 periodicity were evident in our results. Bottle confinement effects have been shown to lead to serious underestimates of rate processes (Venrick et al 1977) but the constant rates of chl a and POC & PON synthesis indicate no such artifacts in our experiments. Olson & Chisholm (1983) have shown that cell division patterns of nitrogenlimited phytoplankton cultures may be entrained by NH: pulses.…”
Section: Simultaneous Uptake Of Nitrogen Compoundscontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Several aspects of this technique may be detrimental to the growth of microflagellates, including prefiltration of the inocula and long duration of the experiment. Microflagellates can be damaged during pre-filtration (Bloem & Gilissen 1985, Goldman & Dennett 1986) and they also are sensitive to containment (Venrick et al 1975, Fahnenstiel & Scavia 1987. We believe that future work in marine environments using a variety of techniques will not find a consistent dichotomy in growth rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The enzyme assay was started by addition of multiple concentrations of substrate analog (2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, 40.0 mM, final concentration) usually within 2-3 hours of sampling, and incubation time was kept relatively short (within 45 min.) in order to minimize bottle effect 46) or nonlinear metabolic responses 16) . No illumination or shaking was provided during the incubation.…”
Section: Standardization Of Enzyme Assay and Estimation Of Apamentioning
confidence: 99%