2002
DOI: 10.1037/1064-1297.10.1.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible amotivational effects following marijuana smoking under laboratory conditions.

Abstract: Human participants earned money by responding on a progressive-ratio (PR) schedule (initial value $50) or received money without responding on a fixed-time (FT) schedule. During the session, participants could terminate the PR schedule and initiate an FT 200-s schedule. In Experiment 1, increases in monetary value produced increased number of responses, time spent, and money earned in the PR component. In Experiment 2, marijuana smoking produced potency-related reductions in the number of responses, time spent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
29
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(48 reference statements)
1
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Laboratory data indicate that THC acutely affects behavioral disengagement (e.g., Cherek, et al, 2002), which may be particularly likely in a distressing task if the task is lacking in personal relevance. Personal salience on task performance was evident when financial incentive attenuated amotivational effects (e.g., Cherek et al, 2002). Similarly, persistence in a physically distressing task (e.g., cold-pressor task) is longer when individuals are asked to utilize values-based imagery to increase personal salience for enduring acute pain, relative to a control group without personalized component (Branstetter-Rost, Cushing, & Douleh, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory data indicate that THC acutely affects behavioral disengagement (e.g., Cherek, et al, 2002), which may be particularly likely in a distressing task if the task is lacking in personal relevance. Personal salience on task performance was evident when financial incentive attenuated amotivational effects (e.g., Cherek et al, 2002). Similarly, persistence in a physically distressing task (e.g., cold-pressor task) is longer when individuals are asked to utilize values-based imagery to increase personal salience for enduring acute pain, relative to a control group without personalized component (Branstetter-Rost, Cushing, & Douleh, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, preexisting differences in neurocognition, which may increase risk for substance use (Nigg et al, 2004), cannot be ruled out in this cross-sectional study. Second, given the studies suggesting decreased motivation associated with marijuana use (Cherek et al, 2002;Lane et al, 2005), the observed cognitive differences may be due to amotivational influences on test performance. Third, we used composite scores for data reduction purposes, and although common practice, they may not reproduce in other samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of inhalations per dose was recorded and compared across all conditions. Importantly, the current paced, cued smoking procedure has been widely used and produces reliable physiological and subjective effects data indicative of acute marijuana intoxication (Chait, 1989;Cherek et al, 2002;Haney et al, 1997;Lane and Cherek, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%