2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possibilities of electricity generation in the Republic of Croatia from medium-temperature geothermal sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, the decrease of ammonia concentration has a positive effect on plant performances. These results are in agreement with a similar investigation performed by two co-authors in this paper; thus, for a detailed explanation and physical meaning of the results, the readers are referred to [79,80].…”
Section: Parametric Analysis Of Orc and Kln Plantsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In both cases, the decrease of ammonia concentration has a positive effect on plant performances. These results are in agreement with a similar investigation performed by two co-authors in this paper; thus, for a detailed explanation and physical meaning of the results, the readers are referred to [79,80].…”
Section: Parametric Analysis Of Orc and Kln Plantsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, the formation heat transfer was ignored in these studies. Guzovic et al (2012) analyzed a binary plant running with ORC or Kalina cycle, applying medium-temperature geothermal fluid in Croatia for electricity production. They concluded that ORC had better thermal efficiency in case of low-temperature geothermal source (below 140°C).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guzović et al [6] showed a comparison between the ORC and the Kalina cycle based on energy analysis results for a mediumtemperature geothermal source with a relatively low temperature (140°C). ORC shows a better thermal efficiency: 13.5 vs. 12.8% (and accordingly higher net power: 2225.5 vs. 2101.4 kW).…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%