2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10230-020-00659-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possibilities for Acid Mine Drainage Co-treatment with Other Waste Streams: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, wetland macrophytes show high organic pollutant assimilation and removal capacities that may additionally improve mine water quality (Tanner 1996). Synergetic cotreatment of mine-and wastewater in constructed wetlands is also increasingly tested worldwide (Makhathini et al 2020).…”
Section: Ancillary and Secondary Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, wetland macrophytes show high organic pollutant assimilation and removal capacities that may additionally improve mine water quality (Tanner 1996). Synergetic cotreatment of mine-and wastewater in constructed wetlands is also increasingly tested worldwide (Makhathini et al 2020).…”
Section: Ancillary and Secondary Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these studies, MWW worked on the premise of carbon substrate bacterial oxidation and pathogen removal, where it requires electron acceptors [27]. Considering the high COD concentration and nutrients in HWW compared to MWW (Table 1), it is likely that it could produce a high level of sulfate reduction through a passive co-treatment of the two waste streams [28]. As such, the availability of nutrients and electron donors from HWW could be used to strip off bacterial oxygen, sulfate, and metal concentration reduction, thus producing alkalinity, similar to studies of MWW [7,22] [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a 1000 m 3 /day mining effluent with 2000 mg/l SO 4 2− , an estimated spend on ethanol is 131, 400 USD. The co-treatment method of two streams of wastewater has a limitation over the expense of delivering one of the streams to a central treatment site [28]. In most cases, mine water typically forms a long distance from the location of hospitals, and pumping costs can significantly reduce the investment from the co-treatment system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) (7) where k 1 is the pseudo-first-order kinetic adsorption rate constant, min -1 ; t is the adsorption time, min; and k 2 is the pseudo-second-order kinetic adsorption rate constant, g/mg/min.…”
Section: T-45°c T-35°c T-25°cmentioning
confidence: 99%