1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf00928222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positron lifetimes and lineshape factors in deformed copper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(6) we have defined a defect density as the number of trapping sites per unit volume. Dislocation density is generally expressed as length per unit volume, ρ (cm −2 ), 10,15 where the defects density is related to dislocation density according to Eq. (7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) we have defined a defect density as the number of trapping sites per unit volume. Dislocation density is generally expressed as length per unit volume, ρ (cm −2 ), 10,15 where the defects density is related to dislocation density according to Eq. (7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This agrees with earlier findings that the lifetime of positrons trapped in the dilatational zone of an edge dislocation at low temperature is just slightly smaller than that of a single vacancy in the same material. [23][24][25] Measurements at low temperatures are however not convenient for nondestructive testing purposes.…”
Section: B Positron Annihilation In Plastically Deformed Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where JLL(T) is the trapping rate, C the concentration of defects (considered constant), 12 and l/x / the positron lifetime. Curve A in Fig.…”
Section: + Li(t)c/\ F >mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The deformed samples were allowed to age for several weeks prior to measurement, to allow monovacancies to anneal out, and then etched. Two specimens were measured: (A) One specimen with a defect concentration produced by hammering the specimen to reduce its thickness by about 10% and (B) an undeformed annealed sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%