2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: PET had lower sensitivity and specificity than SLNB. Therefore, replacing SLNB with PET would avoid the adverse effects of SLNB, but lead to more false negative patients at risk of recurrence and more false positive patients undergoing unnecessary ALND. The present evidence does not support the routine use of PET or PET-CT for the assessment of the clinically negative axilla.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of axillary lymph nodes suspicious for metastases is often higher on PET/CT compared to conventional imaging [8][9][10][11]. The specificity of PET/CT for axillary lymph node metastases is around 96%, compared to about 78% on US and breast MRI [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of axillary lymph nodes suspicious for metastases is often higher on PET/CT compared to conventional imaging [8][9][10][11]. The specificity of PET/CT for axillary lymph node metastases is around 96%, compared to about 78% on US and breast MRI [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For determining cN-stage, number and location of suspicious lymph nodes were assessed on both modalities. A lymph node was characterized as malignant on PET if an abnormal focal FDG accumulation was present in combination with high visual uptake intensity (VUI) compared to background tissue, as recommended by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine [17,25].…”
Section: Imaging Analysis and Stagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, management of the axilla in patients with operable breast cancer is still one of most controversial areas in clinical oncology. A recent systematic review found that the sensitivity of PET/CT systems in the detection of axillary nodal metastases ranged from 44% to 67% (29). Patients with false-negative PET results had significantly smaller and fewer tumor-positive lymph nodes than true-positive cases.…”
Section: Figure 2 Maximum Intensity Projection Of Positron-emission mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the increased clinical use of breast MRI is not without limitations. Cooper et al [37] performed a study looking at the cost effectiveness of MRI and PET for the evaluation of axillary lymph nodes in early breast cancer. They created an individual patient discrete-event simulation model to estimate the lifetime costs and benefits of replacing SLNB with MRI or PET, or adding MRI or PET before SLNB.…”
Section: The Future Role Of Mnps In the Management Of The Axilla In Bmentioning
confidence: 99%