2012
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.86.022709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positron collisions with ethene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
14
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(73 reference statements)
6
14
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference in the signs of the potential makes the positron calculation a more challenging task when compared to electron scattering. Our present calculated ICS is compared with the previous experimental TCS from Makochekanwa et al 9 Additionally, we compare our current data with theoretical and experimental data for the ethylene (C 2 H 4 ) molecule reported by Bettega et al 14 and Sueoka and Mori. 15 The outline of this paper is as follows.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This difference in the signs of the potential makes the positron calculation a more challenging task when compared to electron scattering. Our present calculated ICS is compared with the previous experimental TCS from Makochekanwa et al 9 Additionally, we compare our current data with theoretical and experimental data for the ethylene (C 2 H 4 ) molecule reported by Bettega et al 14 and Sueoka and Mori. 15 The outline of this paper is as follows.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…For the sake of comparison, we have also included the data for C 2 H 4 reported by Bettega et al 14 and Sueoka and Mori in Figure 2. 15 Our present ICS + Born results present the same overall behavior as those (experimental and theoretical) data reported for the ethylene molecule.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We see that the TCS decreases monotonically in magnitude as a function of the incident energy except for a small bump centered at around 6 eV, which is likely to arise from the opening of the Ps formation channel (see Table I). This TCS behavior is not surprising as we have observed similar trends in our earlier investigations on positron collisions with non-polar polyatomic molecules (e.g., Bettega et al, 2012;Chiari et al, 2013c;and 2014c). In those studies, we mainly ascribed that kind of behavior in the TCS to the attractive dipole interaction between the incident positron and the target molecule, which can overcome the Coulomb repulsion at those low impact energies.…”
Section: A N-pentanementioning
confidence: 53%
“…In those studies, we mainly ascribed that kind of behavior in the TCS to the attractive dipole interaction between the incident positron and the target molecule, which can overcome the Coulomb repulsion at those low impact energies. However, we note that the presence of a virtual state for positron binding at very low energies was also found to contribute to the sharp increase in the TCS for some of those targets (Bettega et al, 2012;Zecca et al, 2012c;and Chiari et al, 2013c). The very low-energy behaviour of the TCSs plotted in Fig.…”
Section: A N-pentanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now clear that experiment alone cannot provide such a comprehensive data base [10], so that theoretical models need to be developed to fulfill that role. Such models might include the B-spline R-matrix approach for electron-atom scattering [11], an equivalent Rmatrix method for electron-molecule scattering [12], Schwinger Multichannel (SMC) methods [13,14], the Kohn-Variational approach [15] and our own independent atom method with screening-corrected additivity rule (IAM-SCAR) model [16,17]. However, we note that experimental data will continue to play a vital role in benchmarking theory [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%