1983
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.27.5257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positron annihilation on pure and carbon-dopedα-iron in thermal equilibrium

Abstract: Positron-annihilationS-parameter measurements in thermal equilibrium on pure and carbon-doped (50 and 750 at. ppm) a-iron are presented. It is shown that trapping of positrons in both monovacancies and carbon-vacancy pairs occurs, even far above the dissociation temperature of the vacancy pairs. Therefore, a three-state trapping model is used in the analysis of the measured S curves. The vacancy-formation enthalpy in both the paramagnetic and ferromagnetic state is deduced: It is found to be 1.79%0.10 eV in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
46
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
20
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One can discern from Table 2 that the calculated E v value of the S site in W or Fe is compatible with corresponding experimental data [25,26], and that E v in W or Fe is bigger than the E b value of the S site, indicating that the vacancy formation in W or Fe bulk is more difficult than the embedding of He atom in the vacancy position. Moreover, the E b value of the S site in W or Fe is much smaller than the corresponding value of the T or O site.…”
Section: Solution Energysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…One can discern from Table 2 that the calculated E v value of the S site in W or Fe is compatible with corresponding experimental data [25,26], and that E v in W or Fe is bigger than the E b value of the S site, indicating that the vacancy formation in W or Fe bulk is more difficult than the embedding of He atom in the vacancy position. Moreover, the E b value of the S site in W or Fe is much smaller than the corresponding value of the T or O site.…”
Section: Solution Energysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…89 eV which is comparable with other MD result (1.72 eV[28]) simulated with different interatomic potential and consistent with the experimental value of 2.0 ± 0.2 eV[29]. The binding energy between a Li atom and a vacancy was computed to be 3.35 eV.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…Table II compares the formation energies of vacancies and di-vacancies obtained by the BOP with DFT calculations [51][52][53][54] and experimental measurements. 55,56 Clearly, BOP calculations reproduce very well the formation energies of both vacancies and di-vacancies found in DFT calculations and experiments. Table II also contains the vacancy migration energy evaluated using the nudged elastic band (NEB) method.…”
Section: B Vacancies and Di-vacanciessupporting
confidence: 48%