2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jat.2014.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positivity of rational functions and their diagonals

Abstract: The problem to decide whether a given rational function in several variables is positive, in the sense that all its Taylor coefficients are positive, goes back to Szeg\H{o} as well as Askey and Gasper, who inspired more recent work. It is well known that the diagonal coefficients of rational functions are $D$-finite. This note is motivated by the observation that, for several of the rational functions whose positivity has received special attention, the diagonal terms in fact have arithmetic significance and a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Askey-Gasper rational function (31), whose positivity is proved in [AG77] and [GRZ83], is an interesting instance of a rational function on the boundary of positivity (if the 4 is replaced by 4 + ε, for any ε > 0, then the resulting rational function is not positive). The present work was, in part, motivated by the observation [SZ14] that for several of the rational functions, which have been shown or conjectured to be on the boundary of positivity, the diagonal coefficients are arithmetically interesting sequences with links to modular forms. Note that the Askey-Gasper rational function (31) corresponds to the choice λ = (3) and α = −4 in Theorem 3.1, which makes its Taylor coefficients G(n) = A (3),−4 (n) explicit.…”
Section: Main Results and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Askey-Gasper rational function (31), whose positivity is proved in [AG77] and [GRZ83], is an interesting instance of a rational function on the boundary of positivity (if the 4 is replaced by 4 + ε, for any ε > 0, then the resulting rational function is not positive). The present work was, in part, motivated by the observation [SZ14] that for several of the rational functions, which have been shown or conjectured to be on the boundary of positivity, the diagonal coefficients are arithmetically interesting sequences with links to modular forms. Note that the Askey-Gasper rational function (31) corresponds to the choice λ = (3) and α = −4 in Theorem 3.1, which makes its Taylor coefficients G(n) = A (3),−4 (n) explicit.…”
Section: Main Results and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cases d = 4, 5, 6, Kauers [13] proved nonnegativity of these diagonal coefficients by applying cylindrical algebraic decomposition (CAD) to the respective recurrences. On the other hand, it is suggested in [25] that the diagonal coefficients are eventually positive if c < (d − 1) d−1 .…”
Section: S(x Y Z W)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be precise, (iii) ⇒ (ii) ⇒ (i) is trivial (look at δ 1 ); nonnegativity of all coefficients of F c,d holds for some interval c ∈ [0, c max ], therefore the conjecture comes down to nonnegativity of [11] but omitted from the paper due to length. This question is generalized in [25] to all of M d . More specifically, with nonnegativity in place of positivity, the authors of that paper wonder whether positivity of F is equivalent to positivity of diag F together with positivity of F (x 1 , .…”
Section: Conjecture 4 ([11]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem to decide whether a given rational function in n−variables is positive, in the sense that all its Bernstein coefficients are positive, goes back to [23,24]. The same problem was addressed over different domains by other authors in [2] and [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%