2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11040-007-9023-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positivity of Lyapunov Exponents for a Continuous Matrix-Valued Anderson Model

Abstract: We study a continuous matrix-valued Anderson-type model. Both leading Lyapunov exponents of this model are proved to be positive and distinct for all energies in (2, +∞) except those in a discrete set, which leads to absence of absolutely continuous spectrum in (2, +∞). This result is an improvement of a previous result with Stolz. The methods, based upon a result by Breuillard and Gelander on dense subgroups in semisimple Lie groups, and a criterion by Goldsheid and Margulis, allow for singular Bernoulli dist… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
1
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous article of the author, [2], we proved separability of the Lyapunov exponents of H 1 (ω) for large energies, but only for N = 2. It was done by proving p-contractivity and L p -strong irreducibility of the Fürstenberg group for energies E > 2 (for N = 2, λ max = 2) and away from a discrete set of R. Point (ii) of Theorem 2 is based upon this result.…”
Section: Introduction : Models and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a previous article of the author, [2], we proved separability of the Lyapunov exponents of H 1 (ω) for large energies, but only for N = 2. It was done by proving p-contractivity and L p -strong irreducibility of the Fürstenberg group for energies E > 2 (for N = 2, λ max = 2) and away from a discrete set of R. Point (ii) of Theorem 2 is based upon this result.…”
Section: Introduction : Models and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This model corresponds to the case N = 2 and ℓ = 1 of H ℓ (ω). The main difference between [2] and the proof we have just given is that in [2] we could not let ℓ get small and then just control E, to ensure that ℓX…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…random variables with common law ν such that {0, 1} ⊂ supp ν. This model has already been studied by the author in [3] as an improvement of a result by Stolz and the author in [5]. We proved in [5] absence of absolutely continuous spectrum and pointed out that the improvement made in [3] was necessary to be able to prove local Hölder continuity of the IDS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…the group generated by the support of the common law of the transfer matrices, defined at (4)) is equal to the whole symplectic group Sp N (R) , for all energies in I(N, ℓ), except those in a finite set. According to (4), it is sufficient to prove that the group generated by 2 N transfer matrices, [2] and [3], we use a denseness criterion for finitely generated subgroups of real semisimple connected Lie groups, due to Breuillard and Gelander and stated at theorem 3.2. This criterion gives us the plan of the proof of proposition 3.1 which implies theorem 2.1.…”
Section: Abridged English Versionmentioning
confidence: 99%