2016
DOI: 10.1037/emo0000227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positivity bias in judging ingroup members’ emotional expressions.

Abstract: We investigated how group membership impacts valence judgments of ingroup and outgroup members' emotional expressions. In Experiment 1, participants, randomized into 2 novel, competitive groups, rated the valence of in- and outgroup members' facial expressions (e.g., fearful, happy, neutral) using a circumplex affect grid. Across all emotions, participants judged ingroup members' expressions as more positive than outgroup members' expressions. In Experiment 2, participants categorized fearful and happy express… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides simplifying the social world, group affiliation alters the appraisal of facial features and emotional expressions displayed by others (Elfenbein & Ambady, ; Weisbuch & Ambady, ; Lazerus et al ., ). For instance, people are more likely to categorize happy faces as belonging to in‐group members (Hugenberg & Bodenhausen, ; Dunham et al ., ), and angry faces as belonging to out‐group members (Hugenberg & Bodenhausen, ; Dunham et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Besides simplifying the social world, group affiliation alters the appraisal of facial features and emotional expressions displayed by others (Elfenbein & Ambady, ; Weisbuch & Ambady, ; Lazerus et al ., ). For instance, people are more likely to categorize happy faces as belonging to in‐group members (Hugenberg & Bodenhausen, ; Dunham et al ., ), and angry faces as belonging to out‐group members (Hugenberg & Bodenhausen, ; Dunham et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Emotions conveyed in facial expressions are perceived differently by individuals of different cultural backgrounds (Biehl et al, 1997 ; Jack et al, 2012 ), age and sex (Hall and Matsumoto, 2004 ; Isaacowitz et al, 2017 ), and with different in-group/out-group biases (Lazerus et al, 2016 ). Neural responses to the same face emotion stimuli also differ across people groups, further supporting the notion that persons from different social or demographic backgrounds have psychologically different experiences of the same emotional signals (St Jacques et al, 2009 ; Stevens and Hamann, 2012 ; Hilimire et al, 2014 ; Gamond et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prejudice can be defined as "an individual-level attitude (whether subjectively positive or negative) toward groups and their members that creates or maintains hierarchical status relations between groups" (Dovidio, Hewstone, Glick, & Esses, 2013, p. 7; see also Dovidio, Schellhaas, & Pearson, 2019). Two domains of target group characteristics that have been found to have a strong influence on prejudice are ethnicity (e.g., Fiske, 1998;Lazerus, Ingbretsen, Stolier, Freeman, & Cikara, 2016;Reynolds, Turner, Haslam, & Ryan, 2001;Tajfel, 1970) and religion (religious affilliation and religious strength; A. M. Ahmed, 2010;S. Ahmed & Matthes, 2017;Park, Malachi, Sternin, & Tevet, 2009;Sheridan, 2006).…”
Section: Target Group Affiliations and Prejudicesmentioning
confidence: 99%