2021
DOI: 10.1111/jora.12609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive Youth Development in 2020: Theory, Research, Programs, and the Promotion of Social Justice

Abstract: We use Hamilton’s (1999) tripartite conception of the positive youth development (PYD) literature – that is, PYD as a theoretical construct, PYD as a frame for program design, and PYD as an instance of specific youth development programs – as a framework for reviewing scholarship involved in the PYD field across the second decade of the 21st century. Advances were made in all three domains and, as well, new issues emerged; chief among them was a focus on the promotion of social justice. We discuss ways in whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of these appeals reflect a more general concern, stated by White et al (Chapter 20,this volume), that developmental scientists cannot attain complete understanding of youth development without knowledge of specific features of the development of marginalized youth and, we would add, disparities of health, education, economic and career opportunities, and safety because of systemic racism, including White privilege (Cantor et al, 2021; R. M. Lerner et al, 2021). Indeed, this appeal for greater empirical attention to differentiated instances of racial and ethnic diversity applies to scholarship about African American and Black adolescents (Witherspoon et al,Chapter 21,this volume) and Asian American youth (Yip et al,Chapter 22,this volume) as well as to immigrant youth (Motti-Stefanidi, Chapter 25, this volume), youth with disabilities (Volkmar & Solomon, Chapter 28, this volume), youth in foster care (Beal et al,Chapter 29,this volume), and rural youth-more specifically, rural youth of color and, even more specifically, rural male youth of color (Cooper et al, Chapter 26, this volume;Murry et al, 2014).…”
Section: Differentiated Diversity In the Crockett Et Al Handbookmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both of these appeals reflect a more general concern, stated by White et al (Chapter 20,this volume), that developmental scientists cannot attain complete understanding of youth development without knowledge of specific features of the development of marginalized youth and, we would add, disparities of health, education, economic and career opportunities, and safety because of systemic racism, including White privilege (Cantor et al, 2021; R. M. Lerner et al, 2021). Indeed, this appeal for greater empirical attention to differentiated instances of racial and ethnic diversity applies to scholarship about African American and Black adolescents (Witherspoon et al,Chapter 21,this volume) and Asian American youth (Yip et al,Chapter 22,this volume) as well as to immigrant youth (Motti-Stefanidi, Chapter 25, this volume), youth with disabilities (Volkmar & Solomon, Chapter 28, this volume), youth in foster care (Beal et al,Chapter 29,this volume), and rural youth-more specifically, rural youth of color and, even more specifically, rural male youth of color (Cooper et al, Chapter 26, this volume;Murry et al, 2014).…”
Section: Differentiated Diversity In the Crockett Et Al Handbookmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus, from its conception through its birth, this handbook gestated during a period when there was an almost complete eroding of respect for and reliance on the United States as a positive force for democracy and social justice in the world and when world media and political attention turned to egregious instances of systemic racism and the oppression and marginalization of young people not only in relation to race but also in regard to their ethnicity, gender identity, and sexual orientation (R. M. Lerner et al, 2021). These injustices were coupled with inequities within and across health care systems, elementary and secondary education, higher education, business and industry, and politics.…”
Section: Necessarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, these concepts do not develop in a vacuum but instead grow through the bidirectional contextual systems inherent in RDS theory. This bidirectionality is important to note, as recent research highlights that youth in some contexts are not thriving in the same ways or at the same rates as other youth (Lerner et al, 2021;Murry et al, 2018).…”
Section: Thriving In a 21st-century Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Positive Youth Development and Resilience Theory provides a robust and innovative framework for examining YMSM who experience significant exposure to syndemic and social health disparities [19,20]. In health behavior, syndemics are linked to health problems that occur among specific groups because of personal (eg, higher anxiety or depression) or environmental conditions (eg, disease concentration and lack of resources) that interact and produce negative effects on individuals [21].…”
Section: Theoretical Foundation: Positive Youth Development and Resil...mentioning
confidence: 99%