Positive State Obligations under European Law: A Tool for Achieving Substantive Equality for Sexual Minorities in Europe

Abstract

This article seeks to examine the development of positive obligations under European law in the specific context of the rights of sexual minorities. It is clear that the law should respect and protect all sexualities and diverse intimate relationships without discrimination, and for this purpose it needs to ensure that sexual minorities can not only be free from state interference when expressing their sexuality in private, but that they should be given the right to express their sexuality in public and to have their intimate relationships legally recognised. In addition, sexual minorities should be protected from the actions of other individuals, when these violate their legal and fundamental human rights. Accordingly, in addition to negative obligations, European law must impose positive obligations towards sexual minorities in order to achieve substantive equality for them. The article explains that, to date, European law has imposed a number of such positive obligations; nonetheless, there is definitely scope for more. It is suggested that European law should not wait for hearts and minds to change before imposing additional positive obligations, especially since this gives the impression that the EU and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) are condoning or disregarding persistent discrimination against sexual minorities.

Execution of the ECtHR Judgment in Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania Case: Effectiveness and Legal Implications

“…The aim of such conferences, workshops and other initiatives is to outline the challenges to effective execution of the ECtHR judgments (e.g. delayed execution, improper execution and resistance to execution) as well as to share the good practices to make the execution of the ECtHR judgments more effective (German Presidency's workshop on the execution of the ECHR judgments...; Workshop: Execution of the Judgments ...; Guidance for NHRIs on implementation of ECHR judgments...; Conference Systemic Non-Implementation of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights... ;De Londras, Dzehtsiarou, 2017, p. 467-490;Jaskiernia, 2022, p. 103-131;Küçüksu, 2022, p. 1-24;Lambert Abdelgawad, 2017, p. 326-340;Seibert-Fohr, Villiger, 2014;Sicilianos, Kostopoulou, 2019). The effective investigation into the allegations of hate crime and hate speech has been discussed both in Lithuania (e.g.…”

Equal marriage rights and the European Courts

“…8 ECHR and the right to private life. 11 After the Dudgeon case and the decriminalisation of homosexuality in many European countries, LGBTQ+ individuals were now free to live their lives and have same-sex relationships in the open. Applicants subsequently also started more court cases to have further rights protected and enforced.…”