2019
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-18-1358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive STAT5 Protein and Locus Amplification Status Predicts Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy to Assist Clinical Precision Management of Prostate Cancer

Abstract: Background: A significant fraction of prostate cancer patients experience post-radical prostatectomy (RP) biochemical recurrence (BCR). New predictive markers are needed for optimizing postoperative prostate cancer management. STAT5 is an oncogene in prostate cancer that undergoes amplification in 30% of prostate cancers during progression.Methods: We evaluated the significance of a positive status for nuclear STAT5 protein expression versus STAT5 locus amplification versus combined positive status for both in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PDL1-high-expression was also an independent predictor of time to BCR in multivariate analysis (HR: 3.901; 95% CI: 1.287–11.824; p = 0.016). In a third study, Haddad et al [87] compared the significance of either STAT5 nuclear localization or STAT5 locus amplification, or both, for predicting BCR after RP. The authors showed that positive status for both events was an independent predictor for shorter disease-free survival, by univariate analysis ( p < 0.0001), and for BCR, by multivariate analysis (HR = 2.34; p = 0.014) after RP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PDL1-high-expression was also an independent predictor of time to BCR in multivariate analysis (HR: 3.901; 95% CI: 1.287–11.824; p = 0.016). In a third study, Haddad et al [87] compared the significance of either STAT5 nuclear localization or STAT5 locus amplification, or both, for predicting BCR after RP. The authors showed that positive status for both events was an independent predictor for shorter disease-free survival, by univariate analysis ( p < 0.0001), and for BCR, by multivariate analysis (HR = 2.34; p = 0.014) after RP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, while the racial or ethnic status of the patient cohort were not defined in these recently published studies, our study is based on a diverse patient cohort, consisting of approximately 70% CA and 30% AA patients. Moreover, in evaluating the predictive value of detecting ERG for BCR, our study we not only used the NanoString platform, but we compared it to IHC and qRT-PCR, whereas only IHC [85, 86] or IHC and FISH [87] were used in the other studies. Lastly, we evaluated a total of 121 genes or gene alteration events for association with progression to BCR while the other studies examined the association of either a single biomarker [85], or two interacting proteins [86], or protein expression and copy number amplification associated with a single gene [87].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STAT2 is also associated with poor overall survival in NSCLC [61] . Hyperactivity of STAT5 is associated with enhanced cell viability, tumor growth, and recurrence in prostate cancers [62,63] . In colorectal cancer cell lines, elevated levels of activated STAT6 are correlated with metastasis and decreased apoptosis [64] .…”
Section: Hyperactivation Of Other Statsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stat5a/b (Stat5) is critical for growth and progression of solid tumors and hematological malignancies, specifically prostate cancer (PC) [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ] and Bcr-Abl-driven leukemias [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. For therapeutic suppression, transcription factors are typically considered suboptimal pharmacological targets because their function relies on protein–protein and protein–DNA interactions that are not easily disrupted by small molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantial body of work supports the concept that Stat5 is critical for PC cell viability in vitro and xenograft tumor growth in vivo [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], and IST5 has been shown to induce extensive apoptotic death of PC cells, block growth of PC xenograft tumors in mice in vivo [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 14 , 15 , 47 ], and induce apoptotic death in patient-derived clinical PCs ex vivo in 3D tumor explant cultures [ 10 , 47 ]. These proof-of-concept data on Stat5 as a therapeutic target protein in PC have been supported by the findings on Stat5 activation in PC predicting early recurrence of the disease and early PC-related death [ 22 , 23 , 25 ]. Stat5 upregulates the hallmarks of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) that precedes metastasis in PC, and Stat5 promotes DNA repair in PC increasing tolerance of PC to radiation, which is suppressed by IST5 [ 4 , 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%