2019
DOI: 10.17770/etr2019vol1.4099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive Relationships Between Human Impact and Biodiversity: The Case of the Fire-Bellied Toad (Bombina Bombina) in Europe

Abstract: Habitat modification affects amphibians indirectly by reducing energy reserves and energy allocated to growth and reproduction, and by affecting population dynamics and viability. Marginal populations of amphibians in Latvia and Ukraine are particularly vulnerable. On the other hand, several studies have shown a positive relationship between human density and biodiversity, indicating that species-rich areas and human enterprises quite often co-occur. Therefore, both positive and negative correlations b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amphibians have been found breeding in a variety of habitats that are substantially different from their former natural breeding habitats. In this respect, agricultural landscapes are of no exception [ 98 ], and the corresponding human infrastructure has been shown to provide beneficial environments to amphibian species [ 99 , 100 ]. Even so, a further increase of the percentage of crop- and farmland in the landscape (beyond approximately 60%) leads to a sharp drop in habitat suitability (assuming that heavily exploited agricultural areas are not fit for the pathogen).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amphibians have been found breeding in a variety of habitats that are substantially different from their former natural breeding habitats. In this respect, agricultural landscapes are of no exception [ 98 ], and the corresponding human infrastructure has been shown to provide beneficial environments to amphibian species [ 99 , 100 ]. Even so, a further increase of the percentage of crop- and farmland in the landscape (beyond approximately 60%) leads to a sharp drop in habitat suitability (assuming that heavily exploited agricultural areas are not fit for the pathogen).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%