2004
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05780.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive Q fever skin test after vaccination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the five cases (including our case) for which clinical history was available, three had a temporal association between influenza vaccination and Q fever vaccination, followed by the development of the non‐necrotising granuloma. The indurated lesion at the separate Q fever skin‐test site on the volar forearm, found in two other patients 5 as well as ours, supports the notion of a systemic immune reaction rather than simply a local reaction at the vaccination site. The Naranjo score in this case was 7, indicating a “probable” adverse drug reaction.…”
Section: Boxsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the five cases (including our case) for which clinical history was available, three had a temporal association between influenza vaccination and Q fever vaccination, followed by the development of the non‐necrotising granuloma. The indurated lesion at the separate Q fever skin‐test site on the volar forearm, found in two other patients 5 as well as ours, supports the notion of a systemic immune reaction rather than simply a local reaction at the vaccination site. The Naranjo score in this case was 7, indicating a “probable” adverse drug reaction.…”
Section: Boxsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Development of non‐necrotising granulomas following Q fever vaccination is uncommon, with only six cases previously described 3 . ‐ 5 To explore the possibility of a causal association between influenza vaccination, Q fever vaccination, and development of a granuloma, we traced four of these six patients with Q fever granuloma by contacting the authors of the previous reports. One patient had been vaccinated against influenza 2 months before the time of Q fever vaccination, and another had influenza vaccination afterwards (as in our case).…”
Section: Boxmentioning
confidence: 99%