Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive predictive values of sonographic features of solid thyroid nodule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
68
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Howarth suggested a malignant risk of less than 5% for TIRADS 3,5%to10% for TIRADS4b and greater than 80% for TIRADS5.Our findings were within this range suggested by Hogarth [8], Russ et al [17] and Moifo et al [16]. Another study conducted by Hong et al [18] concluded that the three sonographic features that are meaningful findings in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy were the presence of microcacifications,marked hypogenecity and a taller than wide shape. In a multimeter Korean retrospective study, the ultrasound features that were statistically significant for malignancy were hypoechogenicity, marked hypoechogenicity,nonparametric orientation, microlobulated or spiculated margin, an ill defined margins and the presence of microcalcifications.…”
Section: Discussion:-supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Howarth suggested a malignant risk of less than 5% for TIRADS 3,5%to10% for TIRADS4b and greater than 80% for TIRADS5.Our findings were within this range suggested by Hogarth [8], Russ et al [17] and Moifo et al [16]. Another study conducted by Hong et al [18] concluded that the three sonographic features that are meaningful findings in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy were the presence of microcacifications,marked hypogenecity and a taller than wide shape. In a multimeter Korean retrospective study, the ultrasound features that were statistically significant for malignancy were hypoechogenicity, marked hypoechogenicity,nonparametric orientation, microlobulated or spiculated margin, an ill defined margins and the presence of microcalcifications.…”
Section: Discussion:-supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Similarly, in a long term study from Boston, Yassa et al found no difference in cancer rates in nodules between 1cm and greater than 3cm 31 . Similar results have been produced from other parts of the world 32,33 . A study from Seoul looking at sub cm nodules actually found a higher rate of malignancy in the smaller nodules 34 .…”
Section: Sizesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In fact, many authors looking at newer ultrasound features only review solid nodules and exclude cystic lesions altogether 32,33 . In an older paper from 2001, Koike et al from Japan showed that 81.8% of all malignant nodules were completely solid 37 and in 2007, a Korean study of 1036 patients demonstrated that 98.4% of papillary cancers and 82.6% of follicular cancers were solid 38 .…”
Section: 1solid/cysticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, 235 studies were retrieved for further investigation, and 41 studies (14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54) met the final selection criteria and were included in the analysis. All 41 studies were observational studies published in peer-reviewed journals between 1989 and 2012.…”
Section: Search Results and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%