The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive parenting in foster care: Testing the effectiveness of a video-feedback intervention program on foster parents’ behavior and attitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The third study was an RCT involving 60 Dutch foster mother-foster child dyads. Here, there was no evidence that VIPP-FC/A was effective in improving foster carers' sensitive parenting or eliciting more positive attitudes, compared to the control condition (Schoemaker, et al, 2020) but the researchers suggested that the findings could be explained by a selection bias and subsequent ceiling effect. More research on the effectiveness of VIPP-FC/A is ongoing in Flanders and the UK.…”
Section: Video-feedback Intervention To Promote Positive Parenting In Foster Care and Adoptionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The third study was an RCT involving 60 Dutch foster mother-foster child dyads. Here, there was no evidence that VIPP-FC/A was effective in improving foster carers' sensitive parenting or eliciting more positive attitudes, compared to the control condition (Schoemaker, et al, 2020) but the researchers suggested that the findings could be explained by a selection bias and subsequent ceiling effect. More research on the effectiveness of VIPP-FC/A is ongoing in Flanders and the UK.…”
Section: Video-feedback Intervention To Promote Positive Parenting In Foster Care and Adoptionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…VIPP has been adapted and utilized across multiple countries with a variety of samples (e.g., insecure mothers, preterm infants, adopted children, children with Autism, visually impaired children), and demonstrated effectiveness in improving child behavior problems and cortisol levels, and decreasing risk for internalizing disorders at 6-year follow-up (Juffer, Bakermans - Kranenburg, & Van Ijzendoorn, 2018; Klein Velderman et al, 2006; Van Zeijl et al, 2006). Regarding trauma, VIPP has been implemented with children in foster care and examined parental trauma as a potential moderator (Schoemaker et al, 2020; van der Asdonk, Cyr, & Alink, 2020), but no studies have directly assessed child trauma outcomes. Similarly, no studies to date have examined the effectiveness of VIPP for families experiencing homelessness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coding for supportive presence (Egeland et al, 1990) in the ‘do not touch’ discipline situation has been used to measure parental supportive discipline (Lohndorf et al, 2021) and parental sensitive discipline (Schoemaker et al, 2020). Supportive presence (Egeland et al, 1990) was defined as verbally or nonverbally expressing positive regard and emotional support toward the child during the discipline task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'do not touch' task (Schoemaker et al, 2020) was employed to measure parental discipline. This task was conducted at both times with age-appropriate toys correspondingly.…”
Section: Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%