1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf01231282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive Lyapunov exponents in families of one dimensional dynamical systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corollary 5.8, in the case d = 2, was obtained in [J]. The generalization to the higher degree case is well known (see [T,Theorem 2], which follows the approach of [BC]). Our proof is rather different.…”
Section: Real Parametersmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Corollary 5.8, in the case d = 2, was obtained in [J]. The generalization to the higher degree case is well known (see [T,Theorem 2], which follows the approach of [BC]). Our proof is rather different.…”
Section: Real Parametersmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A similar condition played an important role in the work of Tsujii [41] in generalizing parameter exclusion arguments to neighbourhood of quite general maps. Again however we do feel that this is more of a technical simplifying assumption rather than a deep condition.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that it has positive measure is therefore non-trivial. This was first shown in the ground-breaking work of Jakobson [16] and was generalized, over the years, in several papers; we mention in particular [6,10,13,14,33,36,39,41,45] for smooth maps with non-degenerate critical points, [40] for maps with a degenerate (flat) critical point, and [23,24] for maps with both critical points and singularities with unbounded derivatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first and remarkable observation which was already made as far back as the 1940's by Ulam and von Neumann [30] is that the parameter 2 can be thought of as "stochastic" in a precise mathematical sense (more formally, the corresponding map f a admits an ergodic invariant probability measure which is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure). In 1981, Jakobson [6] and then in 1985 Benedicks and Carleson [2], showed that the set Ω + ⊂ Ω of such stochastic parameters is actually "large" in the sense that it has positive Lebesgue measure (see also some generalizations in [24,28,23,20,27,12,13]). Interestingly, however, it is also "small" in the sense that it is topologically nowhere dense, a fact that follows from the remarkable result that the set Ω − ⊂ Ω of "regular" parameters (for which almost every initial condition is eventually attracted to a periodic orbit) is open and dense in Ω [4,15,16] (see also generalizations in [10,11]).…”
Section: Background and Basic Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%