1992
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(92)85340-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive ion pair production by electron impact dissociative ionization of CF4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
30
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the electronically excited (CF3~) * ions do not decay radiatively to the stable ground state of the CF~-ion, but rather to an unstable state which dissociates, perhaps into C F~-+ F and/or CF ÷ + 2 F (or F2). The combined double ion formation cross section for C F~-+ F + and C F + + F + from C F 4 was found [32,33] to be close the 1.8 x 10-iv cm 2 that we estimate for the cross section for (CF~-)* + F ÷ forma-tion. The b r o a d and largely unstructured shape of the emission is also indicative of a bound-free transition and thus supports the notion of a transition to a lower state of the C F~ ion that is unstable .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This indicates that the electronically excited (CF3~) * ions do not decay radiatively to the stable ground state of the CF~-ion, but rather to an unstable state which dissociates, perhaps into C F~-+ F and/or CF ÷ + 2 F (or F2). The combined double ion formation cross section for C F~-+ F + and C F + + F + from C F 4 was found [32,33] to be close the 1.8 x 10-iv cm 2 that we estimate for the cross section for (CF~-)* + F ÷ forma-tion. The b r o a d and largely unstructured shape of the emission is also indicative of a bound-free transition and thus supports the notion of a transition to a lower state of the C F~ ion that is unstable .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Based on the excitation function shown in Fig. 4 and a reasonable estimate of the energy dependence of respectively the "neutral" and the "ionic" channel, we assign a value of approximately (1.8+0.5)x 10 -17 cm 2 to the cross section for double ion formation ( C F~) * + F + at 100eV which is roughly a factor of 5 larger [32,33] than the reported double ion formation cross section for CF~-+ F ÷ at the same energy. This indicates that the electronically excited (CF3~) * ions do not decay radiatively to the stable ground state of the CF~-ion, but rather to an unstable state which dissociates, perhaps into C F~-+ F and/or CF ÷ + 2 F (or F2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the energies reported here, the majority of neutral fluorine production apparently comes from ionisation events. In fact, it is possible to construct upper and lower bounds for the gross fluorine production cross section (the gross cross section is weighted by the number of neutral fluorine atoms produced in a reaction; see Bruce et al 1992 for specific equations). To do this we adopt the following rules: (i) For the lower bound we assume contributions only from sources about which we are absolutely certain, and we choose branching ratios so that F production is minimised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%