2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive genetic covariance between male sexual ornamentation and fertilizing capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined impact is that rapid hardening can promote male fitness in two ways: (1) by allowing high performance during pre-copulatory interactions, and (2) by allowing males to maximize fertility. Interactions between preand post-copulatory factors contribute to male fertility (Birkhead and Pizzari, 2002;Polak et al, 2021), which we show are both negatively impacted by exposure to stress.…”
Section: Reduced Egg Viabilitymentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The combined impact is that rapid hardening can promote male fitness in two ways: (1) by allowing high performance during pre-copulatory interactions, and (2) by allowing males to maximize fertility. Interactions between preand post-copulatory factors contribute to male fertility (Birkhead and Pizzari, 2002;Polak et al, 2021), which we show are both negatively impacted by exposure to stress.…”
Section: Reduced Egg Viabilitymentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The likely functions of the claws that we can discern are at least twofold, both of which are mechanical in nature and likely to be generating inter-locus sexual conflict [6]. One is that the claws serve to assist the male in achieving copulation by facilitating the grasping of the female and opening or orienting her gonopore-ability to 'coerce' previously inseminated females to mate may be an especially important determinant of male post-copulatory fitness [31,32]. A second potential (non-mutually exclusive) function is that they serve to anchor the genitalia and maintain intimate connection during copulation, thus facilitating the eversion of the aedeagus through the female gonopore and ejaculate transfer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sota & Kubota, 1998). Postmating‐prezygotic isolation could be a by‐product of premating isolation via a genetic correlation between male sexual ornamentation and fertilizing capacity (Polak et al, 2021). However, male sexual traits targeted by female preference in premating stages may be absent in Ohomopterus because the male coercively mates with the female (Takami, 2002) even if the female is heterospecific (Okuzaki et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%