2010
DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive feedback and momentum growth during debris-flow entrainment of wet bed sediment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

37
457
5
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 500 publications
(502 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
37
457
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead they found high entrainment rates to be caused by high-frequency pore-pressure fluctuations near the surface when the bed sediment was saturated. This agrees with the results of Iverson et al [18] who found that entrainment of bed sediment was predominantly controlled by sediment saturation as excess pore pressure was generated in the fluid matrix. …”
Section: State Of Current Entrainment Researchsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Instead they found high entrainment rates to be caused by high-frequency pore-pressure fluctuations near the surface when the bed sediment was saturated. This agrees with the results of Iverson et al [18] who found that entrainment of bed sediment was predominantly controlled by sediment saturation as excess pore pressure was generated in the fluid matrix. …”
Section: State Of Current Entrainment Researchsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These studies point out that the main factors affecting (E/D) rates are the amount of rainfall and volume of sediments available, the hydrologic characteristics of the streambottom deposits, the flow depth, and the morphology of the channel (Mizuyama and Kobashi, 1996;Fagents and Baloga, 2006;Berger et al, 2011;Okano et al, 2012;Thouret et al, 2014). Moreover, a number of studies address the issue of identifying governing factors of debris flow entrainment, and most of them have been carried out in laboratory (Mangeney et al, 2010;Iverson et al, 2011) or mountain environments (e.g., Chen et al, 2005;Hungr et al, 2005;Guthrie et al, 2010;Berger et al, 2011;McCoy et al, 2012;AbancĂł and HĂŒrlimann, 2014;Theule et al, 2015). These latter studies show large scattered results, which suggests that mechanisms governing the entrainment are complex and depend on site and flow characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only such a reduction of T x can enhance landslide momentum in conjunction with entrainment (Iverson et al, 2011). The equation @z=@t ÂŒ T jump =rv x further implies that entrainment rates must decrease as basal landslide velocities increase À assuming that all other factors, such as slope angle, remain constant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%