2021
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202007-2957oc
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive End-Expiratory Pressure, Pleural Pressure, and Regional Compliance during Pronation. An Experimental Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PP was neither associated with a change in global C RS nor a change in dead space ventilation. Our data cannot determine if there were offsetting changes in regional compliance ( 18 ). It is also possible that PP improved lung compliance via dorsal alveolar recruitment while reducing chest wall compliance, yielding no overall change in C RS ( 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PP was neither associated with a change in global C RS nor a change in dead space ventilation. Our data cannot determine if there were offsetting changes in regional compliance ( 18 ). It is also possible that PP improved lung compliance via dorsal alveolar recruitment while reducing chest wall compliance, yielding no overall change in C RS ( 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As an explanation for these findings, we note the more homogenous distribution of ventilation (and thus V/Q) seen in the prone position. It has been reported that in the supine position, the optimal PEEP for dependent and nondependent lung regions is different, limiting the improvement in V/Q matching that may be achieved with PEEP alone ( 18 , 27 ). However, with PP, optimal levels of regional PEEP are similar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, despite no differences were found in driving pressure change, PEEP and recruitment may have played a role in some patients. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of PEEP [33], lung recruitment and/or recruitability [34,35] on PP response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main characteristics of the population are summarized in Table 1. Age was 66 years [59-72], 152 patients (79.6%) were males, SAPS II and SOFA scores at admission were 38 [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] and 5 [3][4][5][6][7], respectively. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (104/191, 54.5%).…”
Section: Main Characteristics Of the Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the PROSEVA study, patients underwent four prone position sessions on average, which lasted 17 consecutive hours each, even if oxygenation did not improve following proning [ 68 ]. This recommendation emphasizes that the beneficial effect of prone position in patients with severe hypoxemia is expected mainly through the increase in lung homogeneity and the associated reduction of regional stress and strain [ 86 ] and, secondarily, through improvement in oxygenation [ 87 ]. Therefore, beyond PaO 2 /FiO 2 changes following proning, reduction of plateau airway pressure, driving pressure and transpulmonary pressure (if available) should be evaluated as well.…”
Section: Ecmo Versus Conventional Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%