2017
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive Emotion Facilitates Cognitive Flexibility: An fMRI Study

Abstract: Cognitive flexibility is the ability to switch rapidly between multiple goals. By using a task-switching paradigm, the present study investigated how positive emotion affected cognitive flexibility and the underlying neural mechanisms. After viewing pictures of different emotional valence (positive, negative, or neutral), participants discriminated whether a target digit in a specific color was odd or even. After a series of trials, the color of target stimuli was changed, i.e., the switch condition. Switch co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
31
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(60 reference statements)
7
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Both sets of analyses had enough power to detect effect sizes from similar studies in this literature; a posthoc power analysis indicated that we had 80% power to detect a partial eta squared of 0.06-0.10, depending on the specific analysis. This is within the same range as effect sizes reported in the mood/CF literature (e.g., Wang, Chen, & Yue, 2017;Zwosta et al, 2013;Nadler, Rabi, & Minda, 2010). There are several possible explanations for failing to reject the null hypothesis in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both sets of analyses had enough power to detect effect sizes from similar studies in this literature; a posthoc power analysis indicated that we had 80% power to detect a partial eta squared of 0.06-0.10, depending on the specific analysis. This is within the same range as effect sizes reported in the mood/CF literature (e.g., Wang, Chen, & Yue, 2017;Zwosta et al, 2013;Nadler, Rabi, & Minda, 2010). There are several possible explanations for failing to reject the null hypothesis in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Phillips and colleagues (2002) found that those in a happy mood were significantly slower on a switching condition of a traditional Stroop task, and López-Benítez et al (2017) found that trait positive mood did not influence task switching. There are also studies finding enhanced CF under positive mood (e.g., Wang, Chen, & Yue, 2017;Murray et al, 1990;Nadler, Rabi, & Minda, 2010), but there are clear discrepancies in the literature. The variety of mood inductions (videos, images, memory procedures) and CF tasks (Stroop tasks, reversal learning, category learning) used in this literature make it difficult to evaluate any patterns in these findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For instance, the study conducted by Yang and Yang (2014) indicated that induced positive affect was beneficial for switching costs but not mixing costs. The finding that positive mood lowers switching costs was further supported by an experimental study using neuroscience methods and a dopamine explanation, as in the case of WM (Wang et al 2017).…”
Section: Updating and Switching And Their Non-cognitive Correlatesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…First, most studies of WM show that negative mood has no effect or hinders WM, whereas positive mood enhances it. Likewise, in the case of switching, positive mood enhances cognitive flexibility whereas negative mood has no effect or impairs it (Dreisbach and Goschke 2004;Wang et al 2017). The lack of clear conclusions from studies of mood and executive control may be associated with the fact that the studies reviewed used different conceptualizations of WM (updating or capacity) and different study designs (everyday experienced vs. experimentally induced mood).…”
Section: Updating and Switching And Their Non-cognitive Correlatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Di sisi lain, peran emosi dapat mengganggu kontrol kognitif, pembajakan perhatian dan menguras sumber kognitif (Marc, Todd, & Michael, 2007 (Zelazo & Carlson, 2012). Para ahli menjelaskan berdasarkan riset yang telah dilakukan bahwa bagaimana emosi dan faktor lainnya memengaruhi tiga kinerja inti dari executive function, yakni : (a) cognitive flexibility (Wang, Chen, & Yue, 2017;Yazdi, Farahi, Farahi, & Hosseini, 2018). ; (b) working memory (Hur, Iordan, Dolcos, & Barenbaum, 2017;Osaka, Yaoi, Minamoto, & Osaka, 2013) (Happaney, Zelazo, & Stuss, 2004;Zelazo & Müller, 2002).…”
Section: Pengantarunclassified