2013
DOI: 10.1002/acp.2972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive Effects of Imagery on Police Officers' Shooting Performance under Threat

Abstract: We investigated the effects of imagery on police officers' shooting performance under threat. To this end, 66 officers executed a realistic shooting exercise against an opponent that initially did not shoot back with painful coloured-soap cartridges (low-threat condition) followed by a condition in which he did [high-threat (HT) condition]. In between conditions, participants performed an imagery intervention: one group imagined 'successful shot execution' and one imagined 'successful shot execution under thre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nieuwenhuys et al 19 ) , postulated that more anxious police officers are more inclined to use their fire arm and make a greater number of incorrect shooting decisions, and go on to conclude that the impact of a threat on shooting decisions is robust and may be difficult to overcome within the limits of available practice paradigms. Furthermore, Colin et al 24 ) , similarly investigated shooting performance; however they utilised an imagery intervention (that asked officers to either imagine successful shot execution, or successful shot execution under threat and any accompanying emotions) between the low threat and high threat trials. Analysis indicated that both imagery groups maintained their shot accuracy in high anxiety situations compared to the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nieuwenhuys et al 19 ) , postulated that more anxious police officers are more inclined to use their fire arm and make a greater number of incorrect shooting decisions, and go on to conclude that the impact of a threat on shooting decisions is robust and may be difficult to overcome within the limits of available practice paradigms. Furthermore, Colin et al 24 ) , similarly investigated shooting performance; however they utilised an imagery intervention (that asked officers to either imagine successful shot execution, or successful shot execution under threat and any accompanying emotions) between the low threat and high threat trials. Analysis indicated that both imagery groups maintained their shot accuracy in high anxiety situations compared to the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our reasoning was that control of breathing (as trained in the experimental sessions) would indirectly influence heart rate, thereby slowing the rate of beat per/minute increases between measures for the experimental group. Accepting the null in this case, however, is not too surprising; others (e.g., Colin et al, 2013) have also found significant differences in performance measures without a corresponding change or difference in heart rate. Additionally, cadets in the control group reported using a technique to control breathing (as previously taught in the academy), which may have hidden any potential group differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…For example, Arnetz et al, (2008) were able to show that psychological training in skills such as arousal control and performance-enhancing imagery could moderate heart rate and improve performance in a high stress police training scenario. Other studies have demonstrated specific police skill effects such as improved shot performance with decreased subjective stress and anxiety (Whetstone, 1996;Shipley & Baranski, 2002;Colin, et al, 2013). The current study seeks to contribute to this growing body of evidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…To indicate the extent to which executing the SF and FS strategy under high threat led to acute feelings of anxiety, directly after the experiment, participants reported how anxious they had felt while executing the respective strategies. In line with previous studies (e.g., Colin, Nieuwenhuys, Visser, & Oudejans, ; Nibbeling, Oudejans, Ubink, & Daanen, ; Nieuwenhuys & Oudejans, , ) – which indicated that self‐report measures of anxiety show good discriminatory validity and often reflect physiological responses to threat (also when conditions are randomized across trials; e.g., Gladwin, Hashemi, Van Ast, & Roelofs, ) – this was carried out using a 10 cm long visual analogue scale (ranging from ‘not anxious at all’ to ‘extremely anxious’ ) called the ‘anxiety thermometer’ (Houtman & Bakker, ). As reported by Houtman and Bakker, concurrent validity and test–retest reliability of the anxiety thermometer are fair, with correlation coefficients ranging between .60 and .78.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%