2022
DOI: 10.1002/edn3.282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive effect of filtration additives for increasing environmental DNA detections in summer and winter oceanic waters

Abstract: Environmental DNA (eDNA) is genetic material released from organisms into the environment (Pilliod et al., 2012) as was introduced by Ficetola et al. (2008), and it has been developed as an alternative species monitoring technique in the last decade. Its merits include convenience and noninvasiveness compared with directly sampling organisms, and eDNA has now become a valuable tool for various

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with filtration volume, the number of replicates of filtered samples is also an important factor for estimating biodiversity using eDNA metabarcoding analysis. The source of eDNA in seawater exhibits sporadic distribution, and the estimation of biodiversity using eDNA is strongly influenced by the sampling effort (Bessey et al, 2020;Stauffer et al, 2021;Ahn et al, 2022). The number of detected species was relatively congruent among replicates, with a variation of up to 8 species between replicates for the Akazawa samples and up to 12 species between replicates for the Yaizu samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with filtration volume, the number of replicates of filtered samples is also an important factor for estimating biodiversity using eDNA metabarcoding analysis. The source of eDNA in seawater exhibits sporadic distribution, and the estimation of biodiversity using eDNA is strongly influenced by the sampling effort (Bessey et al, 2020;Stauffer et al, 2021;Ahn et al, 2022). The number of detected species was relatively congruent among replicates, with a variation of up to 8 species between replicates for the Akazawa samples and up to 12 species between replicates for the Yaizu samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we conducted extensive eDNA sampling both spatially and temporally, covering locations and habitats with previous E. akaara distribution records, as well as local marine protected areas where neither recreational nor commercial fishing is permitted. We also deployed sampling methods that can increase captured diversity thus maximizing the likelihood of detecting this locally rare species, including sampling seawater along a 2km coastline transect, and large filter volume instead of several replicates of smaller volume (Ahn et al, 2022; Mathon et al, 2023). Despite the efforts, we could barely detect target species eDNA in the environmental seawater samples with qPCR, with only 6 samples (6.82%) in total showing minimal traces of target species eDNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there was no indication of human-derived contamination in any of the filters examined. Given the sporadic distribution of eDNA sources in seawater [1] , [2] , [3] , the detection of species using eDNA is significantly influenced by this sporadicity [5] . Consistent with previous findings showing variability in the number of fish species detected from filters collected under identical water conditions in Yaizu [5] , this study is expected to reveal similar variability.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The filtration process used to collect eDNA from the water samples is essential for eDNA analysis. eDNA is sporadically distributed [1] , [2] , [3] , and in deep-sea water, it is present in trace amounts owing to the lower organism density compared to shallow waters [4] . Consequently, effective biodiversity monitoring in deep-sea environments requires both a large volume of filtration (e.g., 10–20 L per filter) and multiple filtration replicates (e.g., up to 10) for an accurate assessment of biodiversity in surveyed habitats [5 , 6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%