Positive and proactive leadership: disentangling the relationships between stress, resilience, leadership style and leader satisfaction/well-being

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to analyze the relationships between leader resilience, leadership style, stress and life satisfaction. It reflects an emerging theoretical framework that positions resilience as a capacity that can be developed vs a response mechanism driven by innate traits. Design/methodology/approach To test three research hypotheses, online survey data were collected from 101 E.M.B.A. alumni of a US-based university using a cross-sectional, correlational research design. The results were analyzed using multiple linear regression. The authors assessed resilience, leadership style, stress and satisfaction/well-being using standardized inventories. Findings The results support previous research that has identified a significant relationship between resilience and positive leadership. Unique to this study, however, is the finding that work process behaviors (e.g. time management, cooperation, receptiveness) rather than traits (e.g. optimism, self-esteem, locus of control) are the resilience factors most associated with a positive leadership style. Work process skills significantly interacted with stress level to moderate leadership style. Additionally, a positive leadership style moderated the impact of stressful life events on leader satisfaction/well-being. Research limitations/implications Key limitations are sample size and the risk of common method variance. Though numerous procedural steps were taken to control for these issues, future research with a larger and more diverse sample is needed. Practical implications Organizational stress is pervasive, and resilience is increasingly recognized as a foundational leadership skill. This study provides empirical data documenting positive relationships between resilience, constructive leadership and leader satisfaction/well-being. This research also identifies work process behaviors (e.g. time management, cooperation and receptiveness) as the primary resiliency factors associated with sustaining positive leadership behaviors in times of stress. These results support previous research findings that have positioned resiliency as a capacity that can be developed, providing further support for investing in resiliency training for leaders. Originality/value This research contributes to the literature by analyzing resilience more comprehensively than previous studies. It extends the theoretical understanding of resilience beyond traits using an 160-item inventory that assesses four discrete domains of resilience. The results provide support for the importance of developing process skills in leaders to increase resiliency; thus, increasing the probability, they will model constructive leadership behaviors in times of significant stress.

Examining Relationships Among Leadership Behaviors, Demographic and Program Factors, and Resilience in Physical Therapy Professional Education Program Directors

“…e literature suggests that individuals with greater resilience may be more resistant to stress, burnout, and turnover in their work roles. 35,41,42 Additionally, available research indicates that TFL behaviors 54,71 and resilience 41,72 can be learned and reinforced. erefore, training in the development of TFL behaviors and greater resilience should be afforded to PDs.…”

Leading for Resilience: Fostering Employee and Organizational Resilience in Tourism Firms

“…One such resource is leadership, which plays a key role in developing and enhancing employee resilience (Nguyen et al, 2016). During a crisis, the workplace can be enriching, sustaining, or depleting for employees (Hobfoll, 2012), and different leadership styles can affect employee behaviors (Shelton et al, 2022). In particular, a resilience-enabling leadership style promotes positive process behaviors such as cooperation and receptiveness rather than static behaviors in employees (Shelton et al, 2022).…”

Organisational resilience, ambidexterity and performance: the roles of information technology competencies, digital transformation policies and paradoxical leadership

“…2.6 Paradoxical leadership, ambidexterity, resilience and performance Effective leadership is essential for developing organisational resilience and requires the ability to handle challenging situations and manage employees. To develop the organisation's ability to withstand and recover from disruptive events, leaders must adopt a comprehensive approach that considers the needs of both the organisation and its employees (Shelton et al, 2022). Paradoxical leaders can hold and manage conflicting or seemingly contradictory ideas, values or behaviours to achieve a desired outcome.…”