2000
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5914.00139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positioning in Practice: Understanding Participation in the Social World

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, elsewhere I have criticised Wenger's model for its ability to account for the varied forms of participation and practice that occur (Boylan, 2004). Studies of participation informed by literacy studies and linguistic analysis support this suggesting that understanding change, moment to moment interaction and the reification of meaning requires more fluid frames to analyse practice (see Barton & Hamilton, 2005;Linehan & McCarthy 2000;Tusting, 2005). Barton & Hamilton (2005) also draw on Actor Network Theory and other sociological perspectives to address issues of agency and power.…”
Section: Communities Of Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, elsewhere I have criticised Wenger's model for its ability to account for the varied forms of participation and practice that occur (Boylan, 2004). Studies of participation informed by literacy studies and linguistic analysis support this suggesting that understanding change, moment to moment interaction and the reification of meaning requires more fluid frames to analyse practice (see Barton & Hamilton, 2005;Linehan & McCarthy 2000;Tusting, 2005). Barton & Hamilton (2005) also draw on Actor Network Theory and other sociological perspectives to address issues of agency and power.…”
Section: Communities Of Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not to say that in a school classroom the teacher has a monopoly on power. In moment to moment interactions in classrooms sometimes overt and sometimes subtle contestation for position take place (Linehan & McCarthy, 2000, 2001. Power may be contested more directly when conflict arises over the extent to which school mathematics practices are to be the focus of participation (Boylan, 2002).…”
Section: Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within education, a small number of studies have used positioning theory to examine interpersonal interactions within teacher-student (Given 2002;Linehan and McCarthy 2000), researcher-participant (Ritchie and Rigano 2001), peer (Given 2002;Ritchie 2002;Tunstall 2003), student teacher-student (Cook-Sather and Young 2007), and mentoring (Bullough and Draper 2004) relationships. Each of these studies was situated in a live, face-to-face setting, which is the typical application of positioning theory as a research framework.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all conversational interaction, participants present themselves as a "certain kind of person" having certain "qualities and capacities", and what is said will reflect individuals' "ever-changing 'take' on [their] ever-changing and largely relational" self-perceptions (Harr e, 1998, p. 127). Clearly, interviews are conversations, and as such are the product of interaction, negotiation and the interviewer's and interviewee's roles and relationships, as shown in Harr e and colleagues' positioning theory (Davies & Harre, 1990;Linehan & McCarthy, 2000). Consequently, interview data are no more likely to be "direct representation[s] of truth" (Kramsch, 2003) than questionnaire responses.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%