2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12121974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positional Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point Cloud from NAIP/3DEP Pilot Project

Abstract: The Leica Geosystems CountryMapper hybrid system has the potential to collect data that satisfy the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Geospatial Program (NGP) and 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) requirements in a single collection. This research will help 3DEP determine if this sensor has the potential to meet current and future 3DEP topographic lidar collection requirements. We performed an accuracy analysis and assessm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kim, Park, Danielson, Irwin, Stensaas, Stoker, and Nimetz [40] state that one method to assess LiDAR accuracy is to compute the error of the vertical component and that assessment of point clouds in full 3D (three dimension) is not routinely performed. Work is continuing on this topic, such as using geometric extensions of man-made structures [41] with new standards being developed [42]. These approaches are not tractable for our work since we did not have a dense network of ground truth or geometric structures (e.g., building roofs) that could be used to identify common points for accuracy assessment.…”
Section: Computing Accuracy Differences Between Point Cloud Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kim, Park, Danielson, Irwin, Stensaas, Stoker, and Nimetz [40] state that one method to assess LiDAR accuracy is to compute the error of the vertical component and that assessment of point clouds in full 3D (three dimension) is not routinely performed. Work is continuing on this topic, such as using geometric extensions of man-made structures [41] with new standards being developed [42]. These approaches are not tractable for our work since we did not have a dense network of ground truth or geometric structures (e.g., building roofs) that could be used to identify common points for accuracy assessment.…”
Section: Computing Accuracy Differences Between Point Cloud Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CCC tool calculates the Euclidean distance from one point to the nearest neighbor of that point in the other point cloud. This is done for each point in the point clouds and computes the root mean squared error of the distance between the two point clouds in 3D space [40,41]. We used this average distance between the point clouds to quantify the effects of the different investigations we performed.…”
Section: Computing Accuracy Differences Between Point Cloud Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assure the truthfulness of subsequent analyses and applications, it is essential to evaluate the accuracy of features obtained from LiDAR point clouds (Kim, 2020). This study intends to present an overview of the approach used for LiDAR point cloud data-based positional accuracy assessment of features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assure the truthfulness of subsequent analyses and applications, it is essential to evaluate the accuracy of features obtained from LiDAR point clouds (Kim, 2020). This study intends to present an overview of the approaches used for LiDAR point cloud data-based positional accuracy assessment of features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%