1982
DOI: 10.1038/297319a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Position of the Lhasa block, South Tibet, during the late Cretaceous

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the Asian side, Late Cretaceous data stem from studies of the Takena and Shexing Formations in southern Tibet (Supplementary Table S4)151921444546, with palaeolatitudes ranging from ~12°N to ~25°N12. Basically, all these studies more or less agree with Tan et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…On the Asian side, Late Cretaceous data stem from studies of the Takena and Shexing Formations in southern Tibet (Supplementary Table S4)151921444546, with palaeolatitudes ranging from ~12°N to ~25°N12. Basically, all these studies more or less agree with Tan et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The precollisional paleolatitude of the LT is a fundamental boundary condition for constraining the kinematics of the India‐Asia collision. The pioneering paleomagnetic studies from the LT began in the 1970s (e.g., Achache et al, ; Chen et al, ; Lin & Watts, ; Pozzi et al, ; Zhu et al, , ). These studies have been improved by several groups using larger data sets and additional rock‐magnetic analyses (Chen et al, ; Dupont‐Nivet et al, ; Huang et al, ; Huang, Dupont‐Nivet, Lippert, Hinsbergen, Dekkers, Guo, et al, ; Huang, Dupont‐Nivet, Lippert, Hinsbergen, Dekkers, Waldrip, et al, ; Li et al, ; Liebke et al, ; Ma et al, ; Tan et al, ; Yang, Ma, Zhang, et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies proposed that the timing of the India‐Asia collision ranged from ~70 Ma to ~20 Ma (e.g., Aitchison et al, ; Hu et al, ; van Hinsbergen et al, ; Yin & Harrison, ). Therefore, many paleomagnetic investigations of Cretaceous to Eocene age rocks from the LT have been performed to determine the position of the precollisional leading edge of Asia, as well as to better understand the collision process (when and where) (e.g., Hu et al, ; Huang, Dupont‐Nivet, Lippert, Hinsbergen, Dekkers, Guo, et al, ; Huang, Dupont‐Nivet, Lippert, Hinsbergen, Dekkers, Waldrip, et al, ; Li et al, ; Liebke et al, ; Lippert et al, ; Ma et al, ; Pozzi et al, ; Tan et al, ; Yang, Ma, Zhang, et al, ; Yi et al, ). Most of these studies focused on the upper Cretaceous Shexing Formation (Fm) and the Linzizong Group, which contain sedimentary and volcanic units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify continental shortening in the mid‐Asian region caused by Indian indentation since 55 Ma and to evaluate the relative importance of the processes involved in the India–Eurasia collision, paleomagnetic studies of Cretaceous rocks (mainly red beds) have been carried out in many tectonic blocks. The results from the Tibetan Plateau (the Qiangtang and Lhasa blocks) suggest ∼2500 km northward transportation of these blocks in the Tertiary [ Pozzi et al , 1982; Achache et al , 1984; Lin and Watts , 1988; Chen et al , 1993]. The Cretaceous paleomagnetic data from the Tarim basin suggest ∼1000 km northward movement of the Tarim block [ Li et al , 1988; Chen et al , 1992; Cogne et al , 1995].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%