Position Matters: Network Centrality Considerably Impacts Rates of Protein Evolution in the Human Protein–Protein Interaction Network

Abstract

The proteins of any organism evolve at disparate rates. A long list of factors affecting rates of protein evolution have been identified. However, the relative importance of each factor in determining rates of protein evolution remains unresolved. The prevailing view is that evolutionary rates are dominantly determined by gene expression, and that other factors such as network centrality have only a marginal effect, if any. However, this view is largely based on analyses in yeasts, and accurately measuring the importance of the determinants of rates of protein evolution is complicated by the fact that the different factors are often correlated with each other, and by the relatively poor quality of available functional genomics data sets. Here, we use correlation, partial correlation and principal component regression analyses to measure the contributions of several factors to the variability of the rates of evolution of human proteins. For this purpose, we analyzed the entire human protein–protein interaction data set and the human signal transduction network—a network data set of exceptionally high quality, obtained by manual curation, which is expected to be virtually free from false positives. In contrast with the prevailing view, we observe that network centrality (measured as the number of physical and nonphysical interactions, betweenness, and closeness) has a considerable impact on rates of protein evolution. Surprisingly, the impact of centrality on rates of protein evolution seems to be comparable, or even superior according to some analyses, to that of gene expression. Our observations seem to be independent of potentially confounding factors and from the limitations (biases and errors) of interactomic data sets.

Phylostratigraphic Analysis Shows the Earliest Origination of the Abiotic Stress Associated Genes in A. thaliana

“…These data are in line with the concept that the more important genes in terms of function are older and are under strong pressure of stabilizing selection [75][76][77]. Genes with high connectivity in the interaction networks have similar evolutionary properties [78] and evolve under stabilizing selection [79][80][81][82][83]. The response of plants to stress, of course, involves the basic functions of the cell that were formed at the earliest stages of evolution, such as, for example, the system of heat shock proteins forming a noticeable cluster in the heat stress response network (Figure 4), or a cluster of genes of signaling pathways controlled by stress hormones (Supplementary file 2, Figures S4, S6, S8 and S9), where their fraction is significant.…”

Molecular chaperones accelerate the evolution of their protein clients in yeast

“…Values of dN/dS above 8 were removed, as they probably represent artifacts (10 genes were removed). The mean dN/dS value was 0.1553, and the median was 0.0970, consistent with prior results (e.g., Alvarez-Ponce, et al 2017).…”

Towards a Dynamic Interaction Network of Life to unify and expand the evolutionary theory

“…Using ECNs, it is first fruitful to test whether (or which of) these evolutionary colors correlates with topological properties of the ECNs [ 162 – 164 ]. The null hypothesis that nodes’ centrality, e.g.…”