2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Position geometric error modeling, identification and compensation for large 5-axis machining center prototype

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A linear least-squares fit [18] was adopted to compare the prediction precisions of the previously proposed regression models and the presently proposed BPANN model. The order of the linear fit was determined by inspecting the residual errors of the approximation via the MSE [27,28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A linear least-squares fit [18] was adopted to compare the prediction precisions of the previously proposed regression models and the presently proposed BPANN model. The order of the linear fit was determined by inspecting the residual errors of the approximation via the MSE [27,28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structures of L5AMC are showed in Figure 1, which is designed to have 40m×6m×4m large translational axes, with ±110° swing angle of the B-axis, ±360° turning angle of the C-axis and is a TTTRR type machine tool [1]. The composite framework is one of the most important components of the L5AMC.…”
Section: Overall Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the daily increase in complexity of industrial manufacturing, the demands on large high speed machine tools are increasing rapidly in automotive, aerospace, die making and many other industries along with large free-form surface parts growing demands [1]. Over the last few decades, to improve the accuracy, stiffness and dynamic performance of machine tools, various lightweight and optimization design methods and strategies have been investigated by many researchers at the early design stage, structural optimization and lightweight methods have been successfully applied in optimizing dynamical systems and lightweight machines [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the interpolation method is used to control the motions of three translational and two rotational joints during machining. The use of curve segments can significantly reduce the nonlinear error directly caused by the motion of translational axes [3]. However, since a nonlinear relationship exists between the position coordinates of the rotation axes and components of tool orientation, the tool will deviate from the plane generated by the initial and final tool orientations during machining and will travel in a curved trajectory instead of the desired straight path, leading to nonlinear error [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%