The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12588-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Position-dependent mass momentum operator and minimal coupling: point canonical transformation and isospectrality

Abstract: The classical and quantum mechanical correspondence for constant mass settings is used, along with some point canonical transformation, to find the position-dependent mass (PDM) classical and quantum Hamiltonians. The comparison between the resulting quantum PDM-Hamiltonian and the von Roos PDM-Hamiltonian implied that the ordering ambiguity parameters of von Roos are strictly determined. Eliminating, in effect, the ordering ambiguity associated with the von Roos PDM-Hamiltonian. This, consequently, played a v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
91
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…wherep = −i∂ x is the regular textbook constant mass momentum operator used in (69) and (70). Finally, the PDM quantum supersymmetric approach with the asymptotic geometrical classical oscillator correspondence by Cruz et al [21], the factorization approach by Mustafa and Mazharimousavi [27], the construction of the PDM-momentum operator approach by Mustafa and Algadhi [10], and the current PDM creation and annihilation oscillator operators approach, all confirm and emphasize that the PDM-Hamiltonian H 1 of (29) is the only surviving one out of the von Roos PDM Hamiltonians. However, the quantization approach of the PDM Noether momentum by Cariñena et al [34], and our analysis and discussions in the current methodical proposal suggest thatĤ 2 of (68) is not only correlated withĤ 1 but also more simplistic user-friendly thanĤ 1 that of (63).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…wherep = −i∂ x is the regular textbook constant mass momentum operator used in (69) and (70). Finally, the PDM quantum supersymmetric approach with the asymptotic geometrical classical oscillator correspondence by Cruz et al [21], the factorization approach by Mustafa and Mazharimousavi [27], the construction of the PDM-momentum operator approach by Mustafa and Algadhi [10], and the current PDM creation and annihilation oscillator operators approach, all confirm and emphasize that the PDM-Hamiltonian H 1 of (29) is the only surviving one out of the von Roos PDM Hamiltonians. However, the quantization approach of the PDM Noether momentum by Cariñena et al [34], and our analysis and discussions in the current methodical proposal suggest thatĤ 2 of (68) is not only correlated withĤ 1 but also more simplistic user-friendly thanĤ 1 that of (63).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…− → Q . − → E ) yields only a constant shift in the energy levels given in (32) and (42) creating a new set of energies given in (59) and (63).…”
Section: A the Influence Of A Coulomb-type Electric Field On The Lanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where − → A ( − → r ) is the vector potential, eϕ ( − → r ) is a scalar potential and V ( − → r ) is any other potential energy than the electricomagnetic one. In a subsequent work, moreover, Mustafa and Algadhi [11] have constructed and defined the PDM-momentum operator as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%