Position and Evidence of Predicate Crime in the Crime of Money Laundering

Abstract

The development of crime is strongly influenced by the social development of society. The higher the human civilization, the more complex the crimes that occur. The Crime of Money Laundering is one example of a crime that occurred during the era of higher human civilization. Law enforcement in the context of eradicating and preventing money laundering is faced with many problems, such as the difficulty of proving related to predicate crimes. The study discusses how the position and proof of the predicate crime in the crime of money laundering.This research is a type of normative research using a law approach. Sources of data used are secondary data sources. The data analysis technique in this study is qualitative analysis, namely by analyzing, describing and explaining the data obtained in a systematic, logical and detailed manner, then interpreting it to draw a deductive conclusion.The results of this study indicate that predicate offenses are an important element and must exist in money laundering crimes because without predicate crimes, money laundering crimes will not occur. Proof of predicate offenses must be proven to reveal money laundering. The many types of predicate crimes that are elements of the crime of money laundering have an impact on the number of institutions authorized to carry out investigations, as well as affecting which judicial institutions are authorized to adjudicate.

The Nexus of Cybercrime and Money Laundering: A Conceptual Paper

“…To overcome these challenges, a critical need exists for enhanced inter-agency coordination mechanisms at both national and international levels (Ariyani & Junaidi, 2022). This involves establishing dedicated cybercrime units within law enforcement agencies, equipped with specialized knowledge and resources to address the unique challenges posed by cyber-related financial crimes.…”