2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-017-1611-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pose-aware C-arm for automatic re-initialization of interventional 2D/3D image registration

Abstract: Purpose In minimally invasive interventions assisted by C-arm imaging, there is a demand to fuse the intra-interventional 2D C-arm image with pre-interventional 3D patient data to enable surgical guidance. The commonly used intensity-based 2D/3D registration has a limited capture range and is sensitive to initialization. We propose to utilize an opto/X-ray C-arm system which allows to maintain the registration during intervention by automating the re-initialization for the 2D/3D image registration. Consequentl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to previous methods [ 8 , 12 , 13 ], our approach can be directly deployed in the operating theatre without any preparation of the environment or assumptions on the procedure. This translates to two immediate benefits: First, our method does not require pre- or intra-operative 3D imaging, and therefore, circumvents intra-operative 3D/2D registration, a major challenge in clinical deployment [ 17 , 18 ]. Second, there is no need for additional markers and external trackers as in Matthews [ 14 ] or access to internal encoders of the C-arm as in De Silva [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to previous methods [ 8 , 12 , 13 ], our approach can be directly deployed in the operating theatre without any preparation of the environment or assumptions on the procedure. This translates to two immediate benefits: First, our method does not require pre- or intra-operative 3D imaging, and therefore, circumvents intra-operative 3D/2D registration, a major challenge in clinical deployment [ 17 , 18 ]. Second, there is no need for additional markers and external trackers as in Matthews [ 14 ] or access to internal encoders of the C-arm as in De Silva [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All surgeons participating in the user study believed that presetting the cup orientation is useful and valid, as having access to AP images in the OR is a well-founded assumption. Nonetheless, the authors believe that a pose-aware RGBD augmented C-arm 52 can, in future, assist the surgeon in acquiring and confirming true AP images considering pelvis supine tilts in different planes. 27 These results show the clear necessity to continue research and perform user studies on cadaveric specimens and quantify the changes in operating time, number of required X-ray images, dose, accuracy, and surgical task load compared to classic image-guided approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The X-ray images taken by C-arm machine have some distortion such as s-shape distortion, pillow distortion, and local distortion. 32,33 Therefore, all X-ray images taken with C-arm need to be corrected with calibration target. The designed calibration target was shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Design and Experiments Of Calibration Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%