2011
DOI: 10.1080/00141844.2011.580355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portraiture and Proximity: ‘Official’ Artists and the State-ization of the Market in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same accounts for the repression of religion (see Dragadze 1993). Some artists continued the pattern of portraying powerholders as in the days of art clientelism (Nauruzbayeva 2011), but as mentioned, the Kazakhstani post-Soviet avant-garde artists did and had to do without state support. Whereas the new political authorities focused on economic development and modernisation and strengthening the regime, cultural and spiritual issues initially received less attention.…”
Section: The Post-soviet Art Collective Kyzyl Tractor: Modern Nomads ...mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The same accounts for the repression of religion (see Dragadze 1993). Some artists continued the pattern of portraying powerholders as in the days of art clientelism (Nauruzbayeva 2011), but as mentioned, the Kazakhstani post-Soviet avant-garde artists did and had to do without state support. Whereas the new political authorities focused on economic development and modernisation and strengthening the regime, cultural and spiritual issues initially received less attention.…”
Section: The Post-soviet Art Collective Kyzyl Tractor: Modern Nomads ...mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…(Bourdieu 1996,219) This may not be the case for all Central Asian countries and, particularly, may differ in more closed regimes. However, the Bourdieuian distinction of "authentic" and "commercial" intellectuals still exists (Nauryzbayeva 2011). Drawn from my initial fieldwork and numerous interviews with the "authentic" cultural elites, I argue that the distinction describes a considerable mass of independent elites, many of whom form a field of female art that is of a special focus for the present work.…”
Section: Political Art and Gendered Artistic Representationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Post-Soviet art worlds have been instructively theorized in a variety of ways: as a domain in which new understandings of-and borders between-religious and secular are hashed out (Bernstein, 2014); as vehicles for the legitimation of new kinds of power or authority (Bazylevych, 2010); and as sites of specifically postsocialist combinations of state power and commercial value (Nauruzbayeva, 2011). PERMM and its broader cultural revolution point us in still another direction: to contemporary art as a technique of transformation, an arena where it com-ingled with other domains of culture-from theater to festivals to film-and with the transformative agendas of state agencies, corporations, and others.…”
Section: The Perm Project: Creative Life In a Cultural Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%