2009
DOI: 10.1167/9.11.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portraits made to measure: Manipulating social judgments about individuals with a statistical face model

Abstract: The social judgments people make on the basis of the facial appearance of strangers strongly affect their behavior in different contexts. However, almost nothing is known about the physical information underlying these judgments. In this article, we present a new technology (a) to quantify the information in faces that is used for social judgments and (b) to manipulate the image of a human face in a way which is almost imperceptible but changes the personality traits ascribed to the depicted person. This metho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
148
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
10
148
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These approaches to modeling and visualizing personality in faces (Dotsch & Todorov, 2011;Mangini & Biederman, 2004;Oosterhof & Todorov, 2008;Todorov & Oosterhof, 2011;Todorov, Said, & Verosky, 2011;Walker, Jiang, Vetter, & Sczesny, 2011;Walker & Vetter, 2009) were conducted in a bottom-up way by starting with personality traits individuals spontaneously ascribe based on faces. Here we take a top-down approach by starting with the theoretically relevant and well-established Big Two and Big Five personality concepts and systematically modeling and visualizing the facial characteristics individuals use to make such judgments.…”
Section: Visualizing Personality In Facesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These approaches to modeling and visualizing personality in faces (Dotsch & Todorov, 2011;Mangini & Biederman, 2004;Oosterhof & Todorov, 2008;Todorov & Oosterhof, 2011;Todorov, Said, & Verosky, 2011;Walker, Jiang, Vetter, & Sczesny, 2011;Walker & Vetter, 2009) were conducted in a bottom-up way by starting with personality traits individuals spontaneously ascribe based on faces. Here we take a top-down approach by starting with the theoretically relevant and well-established Big Two and Big Five personality concepts and systematically modeling and visualizing the facial characteristics individuals use to make such judgments.…”
Section: Visualizing Personality In Facesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any of the 200 face scans can now be manipulated with respect to this personality dimension by adding or subtracting multiples of ΔS, ΔC (Blanz & Vetter, 1999;Walker & Vetter, 2009). …”
Section: Modeling Personality Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Todorov, Dotsch and colleagues (2013) have further validated models of attractiveness, competence, extraversion, and likeability. Using pictures of real people, Walker and Vetter (2009) Walker & Vetter, 2016).…”
Section: Modeling Perceptions Of Criminality and Remorse From Faces Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from earlier work that relied on a single data-driven approach to extract the information that people use when making social judgments about faces, we used two approaches -the one pioneered by Oosterhof and Todorov (2008; referred to as the Princeton approach here) and the one pioneered by Walker and Vetter (2009;referred to as the Basel approach here) -to PERCEIVED CRIMINALITY AND REMORSE 4 identify the looks of perceived criminality and remorse. The former approach has been described in detail by Todorov and colleagues (2008;; and the latter approach by Walker and Vetter (2009;2016).…”
Section: General Procedures To Obtain Data-driven Face Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to synthesize random and natural instances is important when generating new face instances [13] and in face manipulation [23]. This is because human perception is very sensitive to unnatural variability in a face.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%